Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Inducing Fear: Cardboard Virtual Reality and 2D Video

2017, Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58071-5_54

Abstract

A Virtual Reality based training can be an interesting method to teach crowd managers and emergency responders how to act in emergency situations under pressure. Compared to watching Two-Dimensional Video, Virtual Reality is assumed to induce stronger emotions and a more real-life experience of the emergency situation. To test this assumption, sixty participants were tested on whether there is a difference in inducing fear between cardboard Virtual Reality glasses and watching a 2D video. Subjective (PANAS) and objective (heart rate, blood pressure) ratings of their mood were measured before, during and after watching a horror movie. Results show that both VR and 2D induced fear significantly in all subjective and objective measures, but that there was no significant difference between these video screen conditions. Based on inducing fear alone, a video based training could be as effective as a cardboard VR training. More research is needed to investigate this further.

References (9)

  1. Amin, A., Gromala, D., Tong, X., Shaw, C.: Immersion in cardboard VR compared to a traditional head-mounted display. In: Lackey, S., Shumaker, R. (eds.) VAMR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9740, pp. 269-276. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_25
  2. Ax, A.F.: The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans. Psychosom. Med. 15(5), 433-442 (1953)
  3. Blankendaal, R., Bosse, T., Gerritsen, C., De Jong, T., De Man, J.: Are aggressive agents as scary as aggressive humans? In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 553-561. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2015)
  4. Bosse, T., Gerritsen, C., Man, J., Stam, M.: Inducing anxiety through video material. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2014. CCIS, vol. 434, pp. 301-306. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07857-1_53
  5. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37(6), 504-528 (2003)
  6. McLean, C.P., Anderson, E.R.: Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 29(6), 496-505 (2009)
  7. Nieuwenhuys, A., Oudejans, R.R.: Training with anxiety: short-and long-term effects on police officers' shooting behavior under pressure. Cogn. Process. 12(3), 277-288 (2011)
  8. Rossi, V., Pourtois, G.: Transient state-dependent fluctuations in anxiety measured using STAI, POMS, PANAS or VAS: a comparative review. Anxiety Stress Coping 25(6), 603- 645 (2012)
  9. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988)