Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Virtual Reality and Its Potential for Evaluating Warning Compliance

2010, Human Factors and …

https://doi.org/10.1002/HFM.20242

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper explores the potential of Virtual Reality (VR) technology for enhancing the evaluation of warning compliance. While traditional methods have limitations and ethical constraints, VR offers a realistic environment that can improve both external and internal validity in warning research. The benefits of VR include the ability to simulate diverse scenarios and repeat experiments, which could lead to better understanding and design of effective warnings.

References (51)

  1. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997). External va- lidity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology Reports, 1, 19-41.
  2. Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or trivi- ality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 3-9.
  3. Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (1998). Aiding orientation performance in virtual environ- ments with proprioceptive feedback. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1998. Proceedings, IEEE 1998.
  4. Bhatt, G. (2004). Bringing virtual reality for commercial Web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(1), 1-15.
  5. Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual envi- ronment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychology Inquiry, 13(2), 103-124.
  6. Burdea, G., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  7. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of ob- jects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integra- tion. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 7(2), 168-178.
  8. Chy-Dejoras, E. A. (1992). Effects of an aversive vicarious experience and modeling on perceived risk and self pro- tective behavior. Human Factors Society, 36, 603-607.
  9. DeJoy, D. M. (1989). Consumer product warnings: Re- view and analysis of effectiveness research. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting. 16-20 October 1989 (HFES; Vol. 2, pp. 936-940). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
  10. Dingus, T. A., Wreggit, S. S., & Hathaway, J. A. (1993). Warning variables affecting personal protective equip- ment use. Safety Science, 16(5-6), 655-673.
  11. Duffy, R. R., Kalsher, M. J., & Wogalter, M. S. (1995). Increased effectiveness of an interactive warning in a realistic incidental product-use situation. [Proceedings Paper]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(3), 159-166.
  12. Dzwiarek, M., Luczak, A., Najmiec, A., Rzymkowski, C., & Strawinski, T. (2007). Assessment of perception of visual warning signals generated using an augmented reality system. Human-Computer Interaction: Interac- tion Platforms and Techniques, 4551, 579-586.
  13. Edworthy, J., & Dale, S. (2000). Extending knowledge of the effects of social influence in warning compliance. 14th Triennal Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES; Vol. 4, pp. 107- 110). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
  14. Gamberini, L., Cottone, P., Spagnolli, A., Varotto, D., & Mantovani, G. (2003). Responding to a fire emer- gency in a virtual environment: Different patterns of action for different situations. Ergonomics, 46(8), 842- 858. Glover, B. L., & Wogalter, M. S. (1997). Using a computer simulated world to study behavioral compliance with warnings: Effects of salience and gender. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES; Vol. 1 and 2, pp. 1283- 1287). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
  15. Gutiérrez, M. A., Vexo, F., & Thalmann, D. (2008). Step- ping into virtual reality. London: Springer-Verlag.
  16. Hancock, D. (1995). Viewpoint: Virtual reality in search of middle ground. IEEE Spectrum, 32(1), 68.
  17. Hatem, A., & Lehto, M. (1995). Effectiveness of glue odor as a warning signal. Ergonomics, 38(11), 2250-2261.
  18. Holejko, K., Nowak, R., Czarnecki, T., & Dzwiarek, M. (2006). Application of augmented reality to the industrial systems for signalisation of emergency situations. In Proceedings of SPIE (pp. 61594O- 61594O-10). Presented at the Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High- Energy Physics Experiments IV.
  19. Kalsher, M. J., Gallo, J. B., Williams, K. J., & Wogalter, M. S. (2000). High levels of behavioral compliance in a real- istic product assembly task. International Ergonomics Association/Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2000 Congress (Vol. 44, pp. 822-825).
  20. Kalsher, M. J., & Williams, K. J. (2006). Behavioral com- pliance: Theory, methodology, and results. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 313-332). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  21. Kim, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Attitude-behavior relations: A meta analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. Journal of Communications, 43, 101-142.
  22. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying hu- man cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317- 340.
  23. Kramer, G. (1995). Sound and communication in virtual reality. In F. Biocca, & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communica- tion in the age of virtual reality (pp. 259-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (2004). Ecological validity and the real-life/laboratory controversy in memory re- search: A critical and historical review. History & Phi- losophy of Psychology, 6, 59-80.
  25. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The com- munication of ideas. New York: Wiley.
  26. Lehto, M. R., & Miller, J. M. (1986). Warnings, volume 1. Fundamentals, design and evaluation methodologies. Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical.
  27. Lin, C. T., Chiu, T. T., Huang, T. Y., Chao, C. F., Liang, W. C., Hsu, S. H., et al. (2009). Assessing effectiveness of various auditory warning signals in maintaining drivers' attention in virtual reality-based driving environments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108(3), 825-835.
  28. Louka, M. N., & Balducelli, C. (2001). Virtual reality tools for emergency operation support and training. Pa- per presented at the TIEMS 2001, International Emer- gency Management Society, 19-22 June 2001, Oslo, Norway.
  29. Racicot, B. M., & Wogalter, M. S. (1992). Warnings com- pliance: Effects of a video warning sign and modeling on behavior (pp. 608-610). Proceedings of the 36th Hu- man Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
  30. Ragusa, J. M., & Bochenek, G. M. (2001). Collaborative virtual design environments. Communication of the ACM, 44(12), 40-43.
  31. Ren, A., Chen, C., & Luo, Y. (2008). Simulation of emer- gency evacuation in virtual reality. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(5), 674-680.
  32. Rogers, W. A., Lamson, N., & Rousseau, G. K. (2000). Warning research: An integrative perspective. Human Factors, 42(1), 102-139.
  33. St. John, M., Kobus, D. A., Morrison, J. G., & Schmorrow, D. (2004). Overview of the DARPA -Augmented cog- nition technical entegration experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2), 131- 149.
  34. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  35. Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Virtual reality. In- terface, application, and design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  36. Shih, N.-J., Lin, C.-Y., & Yang, C.-H. (2000). A virtual- reality-based feasibility study of evacuation time com- pared to the traditional calculation method. Fire Safety Journal, 34(4), 377-391.
  37. Silver, N. C., & Braun, C. C. (1999). Behavior. In M. S. Wogalter, D. M. Dejoy, & K. R. Laughery (Eds.), Warn- ings and risk communication (pp. 245-262). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  38. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1995). Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Inter- action (TOCHI), 2(3), 201-219.
  39. Smith, S. P., & Trenholme, D. (2009). Rapid prototyping a virtual fire drill environment using computer game technology. Fire Safety Journal, 44(4), 559-569.
  40. Smith-Jackson, T. L., & Wogalter, M. S. (2006). Methods and procedures in warning research. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 23-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  41. Steed, A. (1993). A survey of virtual reality literature (No. Tech. report 623). London: Queen Mary and Westfield College.
  42. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 73-93.
  43. Tang, C.-H., Wu, W.-T., & Lin, C.-Y. (2009). Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way- finding. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 722-730.
  44. Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M. C., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Slater, M., et al. (1999). Walking > walking-in- place > flying, in virtual environments. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 99, the 26th Annual Conference on Com- puter Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, 8-13 August 1999. New York, NY: ACM Press.
  45. Västfjäll, D., Larsson, P., & Kleiner, M. (2002). Emotion and auditory virtual environments: Affect- Based judgments of music reproduced with virtual re- verberation times. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(1), 19-32.
  46. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring pres- ence in virtual environments: A presence question- naire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environ- ments Archive, 7(3), 225-240.
  47. Wogalter, M. S. (2006). Communication-Human Infor- mation Processing (C-HIP) model. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 51-62): Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  48. Wogalter, M. S., Allison, S. T., & McKenna, N. (1989). Effects of cost and social influence on warning compli- ance. Human Factors, 133-140.
  49. Wogalter, M. S., & Dingus, T. A. (1999). Method- ological techniques for evaluating behavioral inten- tions and compliance (pp. 53-81). In Warnings and risk communication. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. Wogalter, M. S., Godfrey, S. S., Fontenelle, G. A., Desaulniers, D. R., Rothstein, P. R., & Laughery, K. R. (1987). Effectiveness of warnings. Human Factors, 29(5), 599-612.
  50. Wogalter, M. S., & Usher, M. (1999). Effects of concurrent cognitive task loading on warning compliance behavior. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES; Vol. 1, pp. 106- 110). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
  51. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Display signaling in augmented reality: Effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration. Human Factors, 43(3), 355-365.