Brunelli, T., Cowie, N., & Fujishima, N. (Eds.) Professional Development in Language Teaching. (pp.77-82), Conference Proceedings of the Okayama University/JALT Teacher Education SIG Conference, 2007
This paper describes the creation of a research group for postgraduate EFL teacher- researchers w... more This paper describes the creation of a research group for postgraduate EFL teacher- researchers working in a local Japanese tertiary context. It critically analyses the rationale for the group’s existence, including how it is run and sustained. The literature review considers teacher collegiality and development in Japan, and how non-institutional support groups are organized. The methodology is a triangulation of a quantitative analysis of a ‘Yahoo!’ mailing list’s web traffic and qualitative analysis of members’ written reflective narratives and semi-structured interviews. Conclusions specific to the findings will be drawn and implications for further research will be addressed.
Uploads
Books by Theron Muller
Papers by Theron Muller
Despite increasing demands to publish in English, publishing in private publishing houses’ small number of prestige journals remains a benchmark of journal and manuscript quality. How such journals have responded to increasing demand for English language publication has been well-documented. However, the perspectives of editors working in non-prestige journals not affiliated with large, private publishing houses remain underrepresented, particularly concerning academic editorial work. To better present a diversity of editors’ perceptions, this collaborative autoethnography explored the views of five applied linguistics and TESOL journal editors working in journals unaffiliated with private publishing houses. Issues explored included our respective journals’ struggle to compete, such as in bibliometric assessment and maintaining quality review processes. Our explorative narratives of editorial perceptions revealed issues internal and external to journal editorial practice. Internally, ‘quality’ in blind and non-blind reviewing, evaluation criteria, reviewer bias, and field-specific norms of academic writing were problematized. Externally, issues of open access, author publication fees, bibliometric indexing, and our journals’ positionings in their fields were raised. We believe that sharing our views through this collaborative narrativization can help broaden understanding of editorial practices and, by highlighting issues of interest to editors more broadly, can help to foster a sense of common purpose
Key words: collaborative autoethnography, editorial practices, journal editors’ perceptions, non-prestige journals
the experiences of two language teacher scholars working in the
academy outside the global centre in Japan. Emphasis is given to how
the methodology used, cycles of reflective writing, reveals
commonalities and differences in our respective experiences of working
in the Japanese academy. Our accounts are interlinked with literature on
global flows of labour and the marginalized position of non-Japanese
within the Japanese academy. We present our reflective methodology as
a tool of empowerment that allows for otherwise marginalized voices to
be explored, heard, and shared with the larger academic community.
References
Barry, C. A., Stevenson, F. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2001). Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 487-505.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41 (9), 954-969.
Watson Todd, R. (2003). EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 147-156.