T. J. Demos, “The Scopic and the Scaped: Anthropocene Landscapes,” Gerhardt Richter: Anthropocene Landscapes, ed. Lisa Ortner-Kreil, Hubertus Butin, and Cathérine Hug (Zurich and Vienna: Kunsthaus Zürich, Kunstforum Wien, and Hatje Cantz, 2020), 190-99., 2020
Anthropocene landscapes are mutating geographies, merging nature and culture. As naturalcultural,... more Anthropocene landscapes are mutating geographies, merging nature and culture. As naturalcultural, they provide a post-binary composite of mutual determination: land has been inextricably shaped biogeophysically by capital, just as the latter has internalized nature for its reproduction. 1 "Anthropocene" and "landscape" are thus conflicted terms, containing unstable, shifting meanings and references. While scape unevenly conjugates vision and labor, the seen and the shaped-the implications of which I discuss below-land, coming from Old English, splits ground and property, signifying a definite portion of the Earth's surface; home region of a person or a people; territory marked by political boundaries. Circum-scribed as such, landscapes identify geopolitical determinations subjected to dispute, while its soil increasingly includes human byproducts: chemical and toxic agents unleashed by industrial capital. Microplastics-found in water, soil, and air-proliferate, as plastic derives from petrochemicals sourced in coal and oil, the products of ancient plants undergone anaerobic decomposition over millions of years. With the nonorganic transformation of land, all manner of spaces-geographical , technological, industrial, virtual-expand the meaning of Anthropocene landscapes: these are as much a mountain pass mined for bauxite, a toxic river filled with micropolymers, as a field of lettered plastic squares on a cybernetic device energized by fossil fuels used to type out those two words. As a geopolitical term, the Capitalocene is perhaps more accurate-geogra-phies of capital, natural systems dominated by corporations and their financial elites over the course of modernity. Capitalocene landscapes, in their current guise, represent not only expanding frontiers of extractive industry (mining sites, drilling rigs, pipeline networks, electricity grids, urban infrastructure, architecture, production factories), but also the becoming-technological of geography (server farms, stacks, virtual territories, screen visions, neural nets). This includes legal, political, economic, and trade networks, merged with natural resources-the managed forests, industrial agricultures, greenhouse gas filled atmospheres, pharmaceutical and genetically modified seeds and animals-as well as the remainder-growing swathes of Earth abandoned to dead zones of pollution, mass extinction, and uncontainable toxicity and radiation. More than naturalcultural, these landscapes are biopolitical, critically highlighting the governance of life (and death) under late liberalism, which continues in the current green convergence of science, cybernetic technology, and capital. Early modern landscapes of the Anthropocene (the geological age structured by human activities) and of the Capitalocene (that age defined, more specifically, by modern capitalism), were largely shaped by expansionist colonial regimes producing notions of territory and race by commodifying land and trading people as currency. These were driven by military control, assisted by cartographic, anthro-pological, and botanical knowledge to assert sovereignty. The Plantationocene
Uploads
Papers by T. J. Demos
www.e-flux.com/journal/143/590415/counterinsurgent-cop-city-abolition-ecology-and-the-aesthetics-of-counterreform/
In pondering what future barricade cultures will look like – where “barricade cultures” suggests the strategic and tactical priorities, social values and formations, and aesthetic elements of resistance movements op- posing fossil capital, from land-based struggles to digital insurgencies – Lyons ends the conversation with the following propositional question, which I paraphrase: If what is most needed is not simply a massive climate movement, but an anti-imperialist politics more expansively opposed to the extraction of life, land, and labor – where it’s not simply the fossil fuel industry but the entire capitalist system that is oppressing the majority of human population – then how should activists and artists mobilize internationally toward this goal as a shared political horizon?