Creativity Risk in Software Projects
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), Jul 1, 2018
Ryzyko kreatywności dotyczy sytuacji, w ktorych nie są osiągane zamierzone cele związane z kreaty... more Ryzyko kreatywności dotyczy sytuacji, w ktorych nie są osiągane zamierzone cele związane z kreatywnością lub wystepują niekorzystne skutki uboczne zastosowania metod kreatywności. W artykule dokonano systematyzacji tych zjawisk z wykorzystaniem wymiarow ukierunkowywania kreatywności i ujeto je w kategoriach zarządzania ryzykiem w projekcie. Wynikiem tych prac jest lista zagrozen i czynnikow ryzyka kreatywności, ktora zostala zweryfikowana i udoskonalona w wyniku studiow przypadku wystepowania ryzyka kreatywności w projektach informatycznych.
Uploads
Drafts by Anna Bobkowska
Through a recursive and cybernetic approach, the article presents a methodology where contrasting viewpoints are juxtaposed rather than resolved, inviting critical and integrative thinking.
Using the legal concept of Dialectical Truth, the article models knowledge development through respectful, adversarial exchange. It highlights the importance of confronting diverse perspectives in inter- and transdisciplinary contexts as a means of co-learning, self-education, and meaning-making. Ultimately, it proposes disagreement as a driver of understanding and a vital component of recursive knowledge creation.
Through a recursive and cybernetic approach, the article presents a methodology where contrasting viewpoints are juxtaposed rather than resolved, inviting critical and integrative thinking. Key contributions include:
Jeremy Horne’s "unity of difference," tied to systems theory and cybernetics.
Rusudan Makhachashvili’s application of frame semantics to structured cognitive and communicative disagreement.
Anna Bobkowska’s critique of passive agreement as epistemic inertia.
Using the legal concept of Dialectical Truth, the article models knowledge development through respectful, adversarial exchange. It highlights the importance of confronting diverse perspectives in inter- and transdisciplinary contexts as a means of co-learning, self-education, and meaning-making. Ultimately, it proposes disagreement as a driver of understanding and a vital component of recursive knowledge creation.
Papers by Anna Bobkowska