
Michael S. Drake
I write and teach political, cultural and historical sociology, social and political theory, on violence and war, political memory, and the body in culture, politics and society. I am currently working on a number of interrelated projects, including: the political significance of the dead body, literary sociology, new theories of power and the state, social conditions of creativity, and the cultural constitution of collective identities.
I am Co-investigator for 'Heroes and Loved Ones', a case-study of the commemoration of military deaths in combat, on the AHRC-funded project Remember Me: The Changing face of Memorialisation, at: http://www2.hull.ac.uk/fass/rememberme.aspx
I present my work at national and international conferences, I convene conference panels, and I organised the international conference, Social Pathologies of Contemporary Civilization at Hull in 2012. My photographic work has been used in publishing.
I am Co-investigator for 'Heroes and Loved Ones', a case-study of the commemoration of military deaths in combat, on the AHRC-funded project Remember Me: The Changing face of Memorialisation, at: http://www2.hull.ac.uk/fass/rememberme.aspx
I present my work at national and international conferences, I convene conference panels, and I organised the international conference, Social Pathologies of Contemporary Civilization at Hull in 2012. My photographic work has been used in publishing.
less
InterestsView All (37)
Uploads
Books by Michael S. Drake
This accessible book addresses one of the twenty-first century’s most important issues: the increasing lack of connection between political institutions and the social reality of our everyday lives. A gulf between popular expectations and formal politics has widened continually since the revolts against authority of 1968, the Eastern European revolutions of 1989 and the growth of new social movements. Today, popular disillusion with politics is ubiquitous. Enormous social transformations on a global scale since the 1970s have produced no fundamental change in what are considered normal political institutions such as the state, or in mainstream political ideologies and parties.
This book provides tools to understand the apparent irrelevance of formal political institutions and practices to social life. In order to enable us to begin to rethink the relations between politics and society, Michael Drake ably synthesises the new theoretical developments that social transformations have produced, including the analysis of power, representation, social identities, social movements, sovereignty, statehood, globalization, revolution, risk and security. Ultimately, the book explores the emergent potentialities and problems of this new politics in a world of continuous transformation, where the parameters of the political are continuously shifting.
Papers by Michael S. Drake
One of the key motivations behind this research is to challenge the assumption that precarity must be negatively valued, without falling into the obverse axiom that precarity automatically stimulates creativity. Through this question, the paper proposes an alternative to the commonplace environmentally determinist explanation of why it is that Iceland has such a massively disproportionate musical output (both formal and informal) in relation to its population and formal economy, with wider consideration of the relationship between funding and policy, and creativity and cultural (re)generation, through consideration of these two events.
This paper begins by establishing the premis that fiction can be understood as speculative sociology. The work of the Swedish author John Ajvide Lindqvist explores the consequences of mistrust, doubt, uncertainty and fear in our social and cultural expectations, performing a sociological analysis of the implications of contemporary social change and developing insights in ways that our conventional methodologies are unable to apprehend.
The paper will consider two of Lindqvist’s novels, Let the Right One In (subsequently made into an internationally released film that was also subject to a US remake) and Handling the Undead. The analysis of this fictional oeuvre will be supported by drawing upon a minor but rich tradition of reading literature as sociology (Brown 1977, Coser 1963, Suchoff 1994), which has recently been revived by Michael Hviid Jacobsen (Jacobsen 2011). This 'literary sociology' approach is contrasted to the sociology of literature. Utilising Walter Benjamin’s concept of allegory, this paper makes a claim for a sociological approach which has new relevance in the context of globalisation and the disembedding of hitherto ‘minor’ national literatures.
Focusing on post-9/11 terrorist incidents from Mumbai to Oslo, this paper develops an analysis of the relationship between terror and counter-terror as symbolic exchange in operational form. That relationship is traced through the historical development of terrorism and counter-terrorism across the major ‘break’ in violence theorised by Michael Wieviorka (2009) as the structuring of violence in industrial society, by analysing contemporary terrorism as an aspect of the decomposition of guerrilla warfare and total warfare in postindustrial conditions.
Terrorist tactics develop globally through networks, but also via the mediatisation of terrorist incidents that is part of their practitioners’ aim. Similarly, counter terror develops via the globalised function of the security state and networked exchanges of personnel and expertise and through market exchanges of technology, but also through response to only indirectly related terror incidents, communicated via global mass media. The two opposed forms thus constitute a complex system of exchange that is reflected in the symbolic analogies to be drawn between terror and counter-terror at operational, tactical and strategic levels, which will be drawn out in the paper. The effect is to turn trust against itself, inducing a cycle of fear which serves the practitioners of both parties in the exchange (Joas 2003: 193).
Keywords: Terrorism, counter-terrorism, symbolic exchange, trust, fear.