User talk:Cambalachero/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cambalachero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Definition of life has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2025 (UTC)"Alternate version" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Alternate version has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 15 § Alternate version until a consensus is reached. silviaASH (inquire within) 14:16, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Bogazicili (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
 | |
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Cambalachero/Argentine economic crisis (2011-current)
Hello, Cambalachero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Argentine economic crisis (2011-current)".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Cambalachero/Habitability of Earth
Hello, Cambalachero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Habitability of Earth".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Tautology
"AI chatbot" is not a tautology. [1] There are plenty of non-AI chatbots. For examples, see Chatbot#Early_chatbots. Polygnotus (talk) 13:49, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- The AI of those early chatbots was rudimentary if compared with modern AI, but it was same idea: emulating a human conversation as best as the code allows for. The point still stands. Also, in the context of the essay, it's clear that "chatbots" means moden chatbots, the ones a user may have access to. Cambalachero (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- No, early chatbots were simply rule-based, without any AI involved, not even rudimentary AI. I made at least 2. Polygnotus (talk) 14:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)