Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 5 – uploaded by Elena Levi

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 5. Typical capacity vs. cycle number, capacity vs. rate curves, and voltage profiles of various Mg,Mo¢Sg_,Se,, (y = 0, 1, 2) electrodes during gal- vanostatic discharge-charge cycling at various rates in 0.25 m Mg(AICI,BuEt)2/THF solutions. a) Capacity vs. cycle number curves of electrodes com- prising the nano-materials, 25 °C, C/8 rate. b) Comparison between capacity vs. rate for electrodes Comprising nano Mg,Mo¢Ss_,Se,, materials (indi- cated), 15°C. c) Typical voltage vs. capacity curves of electrodes comprising the nanomaterials, 25 °C, C/8 rate. d) Same as (c), electrodes comprising microparticles.

Figure 5 Typical capacity vs. cycle number, capacity vs. rate curves, and voltage profiles of various Mg,Mo¢Sg_,Se,, (y = 0, 1, 2) electrodes during gal- vanostatic discharge-charge cycling at various rates in 0.25 m Mg(AICI,BuEt)2/THF solutions. a) Capacity vs. cycle number curves of electrodes com- prising the nano-materials, 25 °C, C/8 rate. b) Comparison between capacity vs. rate for electrodes Comprising nano Mg,Mo¢Ss_,Se,, materials (indi- cated), 15°C. c) Typical voltage vs. capacity curves of electrodes comprising the nanomaterials, 25 °C, C/8 rate. d) Same as (c), electrodes comprising microparticles.

Related Figures (7)

Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction patterns of MogSg, MogS7Se, and Mo¢S¢Se2 obtained by the new synthesis at 900°C (1a-c, respectively) and by the regular high-temperature method, up to 1250°C (1d-f, respec- tively).
Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction patterns of MogSg, MogS7Se, and Mo¢S¢Se2 obtained by the new synthesis at 900°C (1a-c, respectively) and by the regular high-temperature method, up to 1250°C (1d-f, respec- tively).
dering should be reflected by the electrochemical response of the mixed hosts.
dering should be reflected by the electrochemical response of the mixed hosts.
Table 1. Example: Fine structural data obtained by the Rietveld analysis for one of the Chevrel phases prepared by the new synthesis.
Table 1. Example: Fine structural data obtained by the Rietveld analysis for one of the Chevrel phases prepared by the new synthesis.
Figure 3. Anion ordering vs. Se concentration in the mixed Chevrel phases. Circles, this work; squares, based on the structural data of ref. [15]. Table 2. Lattice parameters of the synthetic products and anion ordering.
Figure 3. Anion ordering vs. Se concentration in the mixed Chevrel phases. Circles, this work; squares, based on the structural data of ref. [15]. Table 2. Lattice parameters of the synthetic products and anion ordering.
Figure 4. Comparison of typical steady state cyclic voltammograms of electrodes comprising Mg,Mo¢Ss_,Se, (n = 0, 1, 2) nanoparticles (new synthe sis) and microparticles (regular, high temperature synthesis) as indicated. The scanning rate was 10 uV s'!. The electrolyte solution was 0.25 Mg(AICI,BuEt), in THF, 25°C. a) Comparison among the three types of nanomaterials prepared by the new synthesis (as indicated). b) Comparisor between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,Mog¢Sg electrodes. c) Comparison between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,MogS7Se, electrodes. d) Compar ison between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,MogS¢Se2 electrodes.
Figure 4. Comparison of typical steady state cyclic voltammograms of electrodes comprising Mg,Mo¢Ss_,Se, (n = 0, 1, 2) nanoparticles (new synthe sis) and microparticles (regular, high temperature synthesis) as indicated. The scanning rate was 10 uV s'!. The electrolyte solution was 0.25 Mg(AICI,BuEt), in THF, 25°C. a) Comparison among the three types of nanomaterials prepared by the new synthesis (as indicated). b) Comparisor between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,Mog¢Sg electrodes. c) Comparison between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,MogS7Se, electrodes. d) Compar ison between nano- and micrometer-scale Mg,MogS¢Se2 electrodes.
Figure 6. Comparison between the voltammetric behavior of THF solutions containing 0.25 m of the reaction product between 1:2 MgBuz and AICI,Et (ethyl-butyl complex, standard solutions) and 0.4 m of the reaction product between 1:2 AICI; and PhMgCl (all phenyl complex solution) as indicated. 25 mV s"', Pt wire working electrode, 25 °C.Right insert: Enlargement of the cyclic voltammograms near 0 V vs. Mg R.E., comparing the over-potential for Mg deposition in the two solutions. Left insert: The charge balance upon typical Mg deposition-dissolution cycles in these solutions (100 % cycling efficiency of Mg deposition).
Figure 6. Comparison between the voltammetric behavior of THF solutions containing 0.25 m of the reaction product between 1:2 MgBuz and AICI,Et (ethyl-butyl complex, standard solutions) and 0.4 m of the reaction product between 1:2 AICI; and PhMgCl (all phenyl complex solution) as indicated. 25 mV s"', Pt wire working electrode, 25 °C.Right insert: Enlargement of the cyclic voltammograms near 0 V vs. Mg R.E., comparing the over-potential for Mg deposition in the two solutions. Left insert: The charge balance upon typical Mg deposition-dissolution cycles in these solutions (100 % cycling efficiency of Mg deposition).
Related topics:
Engineering
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved