Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Keith Burnham

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
The input vector u and the output vector y consist of the only measurable vehicle states: Here Q and R are the user-specified process noise and output noise covariance matrices, while J and H are the Jacobian ma- trices of the systems functions: The state vector comprises the internal states, required by the dynamic safety control systems.

Figure 3 The input vector u and the output vector y consist of the only measurable vehicle states: Here Q and R are the user-specified process noise and output noise covariance matrices, while J and H are the Jacobian ma- trices of the systems functions: The state vector comprises the internal states, required by the dynamic safety control systems.

Related Figures (7)

Table 1: Main vehicle states The implemented model is a four-wheel-vehicle model with four degrees of freedom: the longitudinal direction x, the lat- eral direction y, the yaw ~ around the vertical axis z and the roll @ around the longitudinal axis x. Table | lists the main vehicle states that are to be regarded.
Table 1: Main vehicle states The implemented model is a four-wheel-vehicle model with four degrees of freedom: the longitudinal direction x, the lat- eral direction y, the yaw ~ around the vertical axis z and the roll @ around the longitudinal axis x. Table | lists the main vehicle states that are to be regarded.
Figure 1: Vehicle control systems The last two decades has seen a significant increase in the use of electronic control systems to enhance the safety of automo- tive vehicles. Such systems include antilock braking system and electronic stability programs, as described by Bauer [1]. Common to these systems is a requirement for accurate knowl- edge of the vehicle states, e.g. slip rate of the wheels or body slip angle and yaw rate of the vehicle.
Figure 1: Vehicle control systems The last two decades has seen a significant increase in the use of electronic control systems to enhance the safety of automo- tive vehicles. Such systems include antilock braking system and electronic stability programs, as described by Bauer [1]. Common to these systems is a requirement for accurate knowl- edge of the vehicle states, e.g. slip rate of the wheels or body slip angle and yaw rate of the vehicle.
Figure 2: Scheme of Kalman filter 2 Extended Kalman filter
Figure 2: Scheme of Kalman filter 2 Extended Kalman filter
The histogram information in Figure 5 shows the occurrence of accumulated parameter bin values, here at time step t=12s. Figure 3: Inputs and reference outputs to the extended Kalmar Filter
The histogram information in Figure 5 shows the occurrence of accumulated parameter bin values, here at time step t=12s. Figure 3: Inputs and reference outputs to the extended Kalmar Filter
Figure 4: Parameters estimated by genetic algorithm
Figure 4: Parameters estimated by genetic algorithm
Figure 5: Histograms showing parameter distrubtion
Figure 5: Histograms showing parameter distrubtion
This paper has demonstrated a hybrid approach for the reali- [12] J. Y. Wong, Theory of Ground Vehicles, 3rd ed. New sation of a model-based vehicle state and parameter estimator, York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (2001). This paper has demonstrated a hybrid approach for the reali- [12] J. sation of a model-based vehicle state and parameter estimator, YX
This paper has demonstrated a hybrid approach for the reali- [12] J. Y. Wong, Theory of Ground Vehicles, 3rd ed. New sation of a model-based vehicle state and parameter estimator, York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (2001). This paper has demonstrated a hybrid approach for the reali- [12] J. sation of a model-based vehicle state and parameter estimator, YX
Related topics:
EngineeringVehicle DynamicsExtended Kalman FilterVehicle SystemDual (grammatical number)
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved