Table 12 found in network G which on average scores 2,7.
Related Figures (25)
lepth details can be given regarding the activities of the researched networks. The table belo
illustrates, on an aggregated level, network level goals and types.
Figure 2: firm membership in Brainport network:
Table 1 Summary of Network Evaluation Relationships
Table 1: Provan and Milward (2001): Do networks really work? A framework for Evaluating Public-sector Organizational
networks, Table 1.
calculation and categorization of scores is applied here:
displays criteria for categorizing networks.
In table 5, categorization on the variable centralized integration is illustrated.
Table 5: centralized integration measures
1981) which impedes an accurate representation of the actual network
the labels per network.
forms the umbrella of the network, the network manager of network E has a much more supportive and
facilitative role.
Item-Total Statistics
Total Variance Explained
Total Variance Explained
a. When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Connect with 287M+ leading minds in your field
Discover breakthrough research and expand your academic network
