lepth details can be given regarding the activities of the researched networks. The table belo
illustrates, on an aggregated level, network level goals and types.
Figure 2: firm membership in Brainport network:
Table 1 Summary of Network Evaluation Relationships
Table 1: Provan and Milward (2001): Do networks really work? A framework for Evaluating Public-sector Organizational
networks, Table 1.
calculation and categorization of scores is applied here:
displays criteria for categorizing networks.
In table 5, categorization on the variable centralized integration is illustrated.
Table 5: centralized integration measures
1981) which impedes an accurate representation of the actual network
the labels per network.
forms the umbrella of the network, the network manager of network E has a much more supportive and
facilitative role.
found in network G which on average scores 2,7.
Item-Total Statistics
Total Variance Explained
a. When components are correlated, sums of squared loadings cannot be added to obtain a total variance.
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Connect with 287M+ leading minds in your field
Discover breakthrough research and expand your academic network
