Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Domenico de Falco

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 1: Comparison of dynamic formulations on the basis of students opinion

Table 1 Comparison of dynamic formulations on the basis of students opinion

Related Figures (8)

The procedure differs according to the dimensions of [A]. Casem > n 1. Solve m times! the system 2.2 The least squares method ‘Computationally, the system is solved only once. The factor matrices used for the first solution are saved and used also for the remaining ones.
The procedure differs according to the dimensions of [A]. Casem > n 1. Solve m times! the system 2.2 The least squares method ‘Computationally, the system is solved only once. The factor matrices used for the first solution are saved and used also for the remaining ones.
Table 2: TOL=10~1°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10~? s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
Table 2: TOL=10~1°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10~? s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
Table 3: TOL=10—%. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10-2 s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
Table 3: TOL=10—%. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10-2 s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
Table 4: TOL=10~°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10~? s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
Table 4: TOL=10~°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66 - 10~? s. No Baumgarte stabilization applied.
' After 1.17 s of correct simulation, the integration subroutine is halted be- cause a fatal error 1 from DIVPAG (see [9], p. 668). Table 5: TOL=10~ 1°. Integration method: A dams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 3 = 100.
' After 1.17 s of correct simulation, the integration subroutine is halted be- cause a fatal error 1 from DIVPAG (see [9], p. 668). Table 5: TOL=10~ 1°. Integration method: A dams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 3 = 100.
Table 6: TOL=10~°®. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 6 = 100.
Table 6: TOL=10~°®. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 6 = 100.
Figure 2: Violation of position constraints: a) Without stabilization b) With Baumgarte stabilization
Figure 2: Violation of position constraints: a) Without stabilization b) With Baumgarte stabilization
Table 7: TOL=10~°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 6 = 100.
Table 7: TOL=10~°. Integration method: Adams-Moulton. Initial time step, At = 0.66-10~? s. Baumgarte stabilization applied, a = 1000, 6 = 100.
Related topics:
Analytical dynamics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved