Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 54 – uploaded by Andrew Scherer

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 7.7. ANOVA of crown area by archaeological period at Tikal.

Table 7 7. ANOVA of crown area by archaeological period at Tikal.

Related Figures (74)

Table 2.1. Chronology of the Maya area.
Table 2.1. Chronology of the Maya area.
Table 5.1. Age and sex distribution of the Maya dental sample.
Table 5.1. Age and sex distribution of the Maya dental sample.
Table 5.1. Continued. 'The Aguateca sample includes 8 skeletons from Qui Chi Hilan and 1 skeleton from Cerro de Cheyo. °The Tamarindito sample includes 4 skeletons from Arroyo de Piedra. *The Montana Complex is comprised of skeletons from the Los Chatos, Manantial, and Paraiso complexes
Table 5.1. Continued. 'The Aguateca sample includes 8 skeletons from Qui Chi Hilan and 1 skeleton from Cerro de Cheyo. °The Tamarindito sample includes 4 skeletons from Arroyo de Piedra. *The Montana Complex is comprised of skeletons from the Los Chatos, Manantial, and Paraiso complexes
Table 5.2. Chronological distribution of the dental sample.
Table 5.2. Chronological distribution of the dental sample.
'For Tikal, Calakmul, and Copan the first population estimate represents the site core and surrounding “suburban” settlement. The second estimate represents the greater site area, including rural settlement. The latter estimate is what typically appears in the literature. °See the discussion of the Pacific Coast samples for details on the derivation of the population rank. Table 5.3. Late Classic-Terminal Classic maximum demographic estimates. Population estimates are from published sources. Population ranks are my own based on structure counts at each site.
'For Tikal, Calakmul, and Copan the first population estimate represents the site core and surrounding “suburban” settlement. The second estimate represents the greater site area, including rural settlement. The latter estimate is what typically appears in the literature. °See the discussion of the Pacific Coast samples for details on the derivation of the population rank. Table 5.3. Late Classic-Terminal Classic maximum demographic estimates. Population estimates are from published sources. Population ranks are my own based on structure counts at each site.
‘1-2 Roots treated as a positive expression of the nonmetric trait.
‘1-2 Roots treated as a positive expression of the nonmetric trait.
Table 6.2. Continued.
Table 6.2. Continued.
Table 6.2. Continued.
Table 6.2. Continued.
‘Critical value is 10.0%. *Critical value is the largest grade for each respective trait multiplied by 5%. ’Critical value is p < .05. Table 6.2. Continued.
‘Critical value is 10.0%. *Critical value is the largest grade for each respective trait multiplied by 5%. ’Critical value is p < .05. Table 6.2. Continued.
Table 6.3. Traits that demonstrate an association with sex based on Chi-square analysis.
Table 6.3. Traits that demonstrate an association with sex based on Chi-square analysis.
Table 6.4. Nonmetric dental traits included and excluded from statistical analyses.
Table 6.4. Nonmetric dental traits included and excluded from statistical analyses.
Table 6.5. Dichotomized Classic period dental trait frequencies.
Table 6.5. Dichotomized Classic period dental trait frequencies.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
Table 6.5. Continued.
‘Values in bold are statistically significant. "More than 25% of traits have sample size < 10 Table 6.7. Standardized Mean Measure of Divergence matrix for Classic period samples.
‘Values in bold are statistically significant. "More than 25% of traits have sample size < 10 Table 6.7. Standardized Mean Measure of Divergence matrix for Classic period samples.
‘Measured from the site of Balberta, Guatemala
‘Measured from the site of Balberta, Guatemala
Figure 6.1. Cluster analysis of Classic period MMD distances. Dashed line divides dendogram into clusters discussed in text.
Figure 6.1. Cluster analysis of Classic period MMD distances. Dashed line divides dendogram into clusters discussed in text.
"Bold items are significant at p < .05. Table 7.1. Test of intraobserver error, normality, and age influence on dental measurements.
"Bold items are significant at p < .05. Table 7.1. Test of intraobserver error, normality, and age influence on dental measurements.
Table 7.3. F-test and ¢-test comparing pre-imputation and post-imputation datasets.
Table 7.3. F-test and ¢-test comparing pre-imputation and post-imputation datasets.
Table 7.4. ANOVA comparing five different dental measurement imputations.
Table 7.4. ANOVA comparing five different dental measurement imputations.
Table 7.5. Total Classic period male and female mean tooth size and t-test.
Table 7.5. Total Classic period male and female mean tooth size and t-test.
Table 7.6. Sample size, mean, and standard deviation for dental metric traits by site.
Table 7.6. Sample size, mean, and standard deviation for dental metric traits by site.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
Table 7.6. Continued.
"Values in bold are significant at the .05 level Table 7.8. ANOVA of between-site differences in mean measurements.
"Values in bold are significant at the .05 level Table 7.8. ANOVA of between-site differences in mean measurements.
Figure 7.3. Principal components plot of Classic period sites based on dental metric traits. Table 7.9. Extracted components from PCA.
Figure 7.3. Principal components plot of Classic period sites based on dental metric traits. Table 7.9. Extracted components from PCA.
Table 7.10. Mahalanobis distances between Classic period samples.
Table 7.10. Mahalanobis distances between Classic period samples.
Table 7.11. Fs; values for the Maya area.
Table 7.11. Fs; values for the Maya area.
Table 7.12. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the total Maya area.
Table 7.12. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the total Maya area.
Table 7.13. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Central Zone only.
Table 7.13. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Central Zone only.
Table 7.14. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Pasion Zone only.
Table 7.14. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Pasion Zone only.
Table 7.15. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Belize zone only.
Table 7.15. Results of Relethford-Blangero analysis for the Belize zone only.
Table 7.16. Classic Maya genetic distances derived from the unscaled R matrix.
Table 7.16. Classic Maya genetic distances derived from the unscaled R matrix.
Table 7.17. Classic Maya genetic distances derived from the scaled R matrix.
Table 7.17. Classic Maya genetic distances derived from the scaled R matrix.
Figure 7.6. Principal components plot of Classic Maya sites based on scaled R matrix. Archaeological Zones: Central ( * ), Pasion ( *% ), Usumacinta ( * ), Belize ( + ), Southeast (* ), Highlands ("¥ ).
Figure 7.6. Principal components plot of Classic Maya sites based on scaled R matrix. Archaeological Zones: Central ( * ), Pasion ( *% ), Usumacinta ( * ), Belize ( + ), Southeast (* ), Highlands ("¥ ).
Table 7.18. Results of four Mantel tests comparing the R matrix distance matrix from the original imputed dataset to the R matrix distance matrices derived from four alternative imputec datasets.
Table 7.18. Results of four Mantel tests comparing the R matrix distance matrix from the original imputed dataset to the R matrix distance matrices derived from four alternative imputec datasets.
Related topics:
BioarchaeologyPopulation HistoryBiological distance
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved