Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 10 – uploaded by Becky Knight

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 17.13: Probability distributions for the dates of artefacts found in trench VP85A. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).

Figure 17 13: Probability distributions for the dates of artefacts found in trench VP85A. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).

Related Figures (42)

Figure 17.2: Diagram showing the overall form of the model for human activity along the lake edge at Star Carr, components are illustrated in the Figures indicated (but the model is only exactly defined by the CQL2 code in Appendix 17.1) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.2: Diagram showing the overall form of the model for human activity along the lake edge at Star Carr, components are illustrated in the Figures indicated (but the model is only exactly defined by the CQL2 code in Appendix 17.1) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Table 17.1: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on archaeological samples made before 2006 (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS; nm indicates stable isotopic ratio not determined).
Table 17.1: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on archaeological samples made before 2006 (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS; nm indicates stable isotopic ratio not determined).
Table 17.2: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on environmental samples made before 2006 (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS).
Table 17.2: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on environmental samples made before 2006 (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS).
Table 17.3: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on samples analysed as part of this project (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS).
Table 17.3: Radiocarbon and stable isotopic measurements on samples analysed as part of this project (* indicates stable isotopic ratio measured by AMS).
Figure 17.3: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model including environmental profile M1 and VP85A 2010, the central platform, and stratigraphically related deposits (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.3: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model including environmental profile M1 and VP85A 2010, the central platform, and stratigraphically related deposits (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.5: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model including environmental profile 3178, the detrital wood scatter and stratigraphically related deposits (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.5: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model including environmental profile 3178, the detrital wood scatter and stratigraphically related deposits (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.7: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates from the detrital wood scatter. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.7: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates from the detrital wood scatter. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.10: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates from the brushwood. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.10: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates from the brushwood. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.11: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model in trench SC22 (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.11: Harris matrix of dated samples from the component of the model in trench SC22 (grey lettering, termini post quos; ?, excluded from model; grey shading, extent of age-depth model) (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.12: Probability distributions for the dates of the burning episodes identified in environmental profile M1 (OxA-3349 dates the start of burning 1). The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.12: Probability distributions for the dates of the burning episodes identified in environmental profile M1 (OxA-3349 dates the start of burning 1). The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.14: Probability distributions for the construction dates of the platforms. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.14: Probability distributions for the construction dates of the platforms. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.15: Probability distributions of dates on bone and antler artefacts in Clark’s area, and carbonised birch bark rolls in reed peat in this location. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.15: Probability distributions of dates on bone and antler artefacts in Clark’s area, and carbonised birch bark rolls in reed peat in this location. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.16: Probability distributions of dates on samples from the peat over the marl in the area south of the western platform, and from peat to the north of Clark’s cutting III. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.16: Probability distributions of dates on samples from the peat over the marl in the area south of the western platform, and from peat to the north of Clark’s cutting III. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.17: Probability distributions of dates on samples from dispersed human activities along the lake edge. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.17: Probability distributions of dates on samples from dispersed human activities along the lake edge. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.18: Probability distributions of dates on samples from the dryland structures. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.18: Probability distributions of dates on samples from the dryland structures. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.19: Probability distributions of key parameters for durations of archaeological activities and inter- vals between them, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.19: Probability distributions of key parameters for durations of archaeological activities and inter- vals between them, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Table 17.5: Highest Posterior Density intervals for key durations of archaeological activities Star Carr and of intervals between them, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.19).
Table 17.5: Highest Posterior Density intervals for key durations of archaeological activities Star Carr and of intervals between them, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.19).
Table 17.6: Highest Posterior Density intervals for the establishment of the different environmental zones around the lake edge at Star Carr (SUERC-65223 dates the onset of fen/carr in environmental profile 3178), derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.22).
Table 17.6: Highest Posterior Density intervals for the establishment of the different environmental zones around the lake edge at Star Carr (SUERC-65223 dates the onset of fen/carr in environmental profile 3178), derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.22).
Figure 17.21: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates in the age-depth model for Dark’s Clark Site environmental profile. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0)
Figure 17.21: Probability distributions of radiocarbon dates in the age-depth model for Dark’s Clark Site environmental profile. The format is as Figure 17.4. The overall model is defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0)
Figure 17.22: Probability distributions for the establishment of the different environmental zones around the lake edge at Star Carr (SUERC-65223 dates on the onset of fen/carr in environmental profile 3178), derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.22: Probability distributions for the establishment of the different environmental zones around the lake edge at Star Carr (SUERC-65223 dates on the onset of fen/carr in environmental profile 3178), derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.23: Probability distributions for the duration of the establishment of each environmental zon around the embayment and the minimum and maximum durations of each environmental zone, derivec from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Figure 17.23: Probability distributions for the duration of the establishment of each environmental zon around the embayment and the minimum and maximum durations of each environmental zone, derivec from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (Copyright Historic England, CC BY-NC 4.0).
Table 17.7: Highest Posterior Density intervals for the duration of the establishment of each environmen- tal zone around the embayment and the minimum and maximum durations of each environmental zone, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.23).
Table 17.7: Highest Posterior Density intervals for the duration of the establishment of each environmen- tal zone around the embayment and the minimum and maximum durations of each environmental zone, derived from the model defined exactly in Appendix 17.1 (see Figure 17.23).
Related topics:
HistoryArchaeologyArtStar Carr
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved