Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Spyridon Papageorgiou

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Tab. 1 Characteristics of the included trials Tab. 1 Charakteristika der in die Untersuchung aufgenommenen Studi« M male; F female; RCTpa, parallel randomized controlled trial; FPA fully programmed edgewise appliance; PFA partly programmed edgewise appliance; PAR Peer Assessment Rating; CPITN The Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs; G/ Gingival Index; PJ Plaque Index; ITRI Ideal Tooth Relationship Index; AFDC Armed Forces Dental Clinic; PEA Preadjusted edgewise appliance; NR not reported; G group; 3D- BMDA Three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalization arches; MBIDS modified Begg intraoral distalization system; MBT McLaughlin— Bennett—Trevisi, Tx treatment; Clin clinical outcome; LCeph lateral cephalometric outcome; Rad. radiographic outcome

Table 1 Tab. 1 Characteristics of the included trials Tab. 1 Charakteristika der in die Untersuchung aufgenommenen Studi« M male; F female; RCTpa, parallel randomized controlled trial; FPA fully programmed edgewise appliance; PFA partly programmed edgewise appliance; PAR Peer Assessment Rating; CPITN The Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs; G/ Gingival Index; PJ Plaque Index; ITRI Ideal Tooth Relationship Index; AFDC Armed Forces Dental Clinic; PEA Preadjusted edgewise appliance; NR not reported; G group; 3D- BMDA Three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalization arches; MBIDS modified Begg intraoral distalization system; MBT McLaughlin— Bennett—Trevisi, Tx treatment; Clin clinical outcome; LCeph lateral cephalometric outcome; Rad. radiographic outcome

Related Figures (21)

Fig. 2. Summary of the risk of bias of the trials included in this systematic review Abb. 2 Zusammenfassung des Bias-Risikos der in das systematische Review aufgenommenen Studien
Fig. 2. Summary of the risk of bias of the trials included in this systematic review Abb. 2 Zusammenfassung des Bias-Risikos der in das systematische Review aufgenommenen Studien
T trial, T/ Altug-Atac 2008, T2 Reukers 1997, T3 Sharma 2009, T4 Talapaneni 2012, O Outcome, O/ cephalometric analysis (increment post— pre), O2 clinical assessment, O3 periapical radiograph, O4 questionnaire, OS model analysis, O6 cephalometric analysis (final values), M@D mean difference, CI confidence interval, 3D-BMDA three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalization arches, MBIDS modified Begg intraoral dis- talization system, NE not estimable, PAR peer assessment rating, Tx treatment, FPA fully preadjusted appliance, PPA partly preadjusted appliance, PEA preadjusted appliance, MBT MacLaughlin—Bennet-Trevisi * Values in brackets indicate relative risks with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals for binary outcomes. Bold indicates significant at the 5% level eS Se Ce, Se ee, |, ee, ee, ee Te ee ae * Judged based on whether effects larger than at least one SD of the control group
T trial, T/ Altug-Atac 2008, T2 Reukers 1997, T3 Sharma 2009, T4 Talapaneni 2012, O Outcome, O/ cephalometric analysis (increment post— pre), O2 clinical assessment, O3 periapical radiograph, O4 questionnaire, OS model analysis, O6 cephalometric analysis (final values), M@D mean difference, CI confidence interval, 3D-BMDA three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalization arches, MBIDS modified Begg intraoral dis- talization system, NE not estimable, PAR peer assessment rating, Tx treatment, FPA fully preadjusted appliance, PPA partly preadjusted appliance, PEA preadjusted appliance, MBT MacLaughlin—Bennet-Trevisi * Values in brackets indicate relative risks with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals for binary outcomes. Bold indicates significant at the 5% level eS Se Ce, Se ee, |, ee, ee, ee Te ee ae * Judged based on whether effects larger than at least one SD of the control group
‘atient or population: patients in need of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment ettings: university clinic itervention: Begg or modified (mod.) Begg technique ‘omparison: Roth technique T confidence interval, GRADE Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, PAR Tab. 3 Summary of Findings regarding the comparison of Roth versus Begg or modified Begg fixed orthodontic appliances Tab. 3 Tabellarische Zusammenfassung der Befunde, zum Vergleich der Apparaturen Roth vs. Begg und modifizierte Begg
‘atient or population: patients in need of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment ettings: university clinic itervention: Begg or modified (mod.) Begg technique ‘omparison: Roth technique T confidence interval, GRADE Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, PAR Tab. 3 Summary of Findings regarding the comparison of Roth versus Begg or modified Begg fixed orthodontic appliances Tab. 3 Tabellarische Zusammenfassung der Befunde, zum Vergleich der Apparaturen Roth vs. Begg und modifizierte Begg
atient or population: patients in need of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment ettings: university clinic itervention: FPA omparison: PPA I confidence interval, PPA partly programmed appliance, F'PA fully programmed appliance, GRADE Grading of Rec ent, Development and Evaluation, Tx treatment, MD mean difference, PAR peer assessment rating, RR relative risk fab. 4 Summary of findings regarding the comparison of a fully versus a partially programmed fixed orthodontic appliance fab. 4 Tabellarische Zusammenfassung der Befunde zum Vergleich einer vollstandig vs. einer teilweise programmierten festsitzende <ieferorthopadischen Apparatur
atient or population: patients in need of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment ettings: university clinic itervention: FPA omparison: PPA I confidence interval, PPA partly programmed appliance, F'PA fully programmed appliance, GRADE Grading of Rec ent, Development and Evaluation, Tx treatment, MD mean difference, PAR peer assessment rating, RR relative risk fab. 4 Summary of findings regarding the comparison of a fully versus a partially programmed fixed orthodontic appliance fab. 4 Tabellarische Zusammenfassung der Befunde zum Vergleich einer vollstandig vs. einer teilweise programmierten festsitzende <ieferorthopadischen Apparatur
Mod., modified; PAR, peer assessment rating.
Mod., modified; PAR, peer assessment rating.
Related topics:
OrthodonticsMeta-Analysis (Statistics)Meta-Analysis and Systematic ReviewMeta-analysis (Social Sciences)Dissemination of Evidence Based TreatmentsEvidence Based DesignEvidence based Practice (Health Sciences)Aesthetics in OrthodonticsOrthodontic ResearchHistory of Orthodontics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved