Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by zenebu shewakena

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 1: Treatment combinations of the garlic root rot experiment at Debre Berhan during 2017/18.

Table 1 Treatment combinations of the garlic root rot experiment at Debre Berhan during 2017/18.

Related Figures (8)

CV (%)=Coefficient of variation, ***Very highly significant (P < 0.001), **highly significant (P < 0.01), *Significant (P < 0.05), ns=non-significant, LSD=Least significance difference at 5% probability Table 2: Mean square of percentage of severity index of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
CV (%)=Coefficient of variation, ***Very highly significant (P < 0.001), **highly significant (P < 0.01), *Significant (P < 0.05), ns=non-significant, LSD=Least significance difference at 5% probability Table 2: Mean square of percentage of severity index of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Where, DAP: Days After Planting, LSD: Least Significant Difference At 5%, CV: Coefficient Of Variation Table 3: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on percentage severity index of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Where, DAP: Days After Planting, LSD: Least Significant Difference At 5%, CV: Coefficient Of Variation Table 3: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on percentage severity index of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Table 5: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on the incidence and area under disease progressive curve (AUDPC) of garlic white rot.
Table 5: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on the incidence and area under disease progressive curve (AUDPC) of garlic white rot.
Table 4: Mean square of incidence and area under disease progressive curve of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Table 4: Mean square of incidence and area under disease progressive curve of garlic white rot at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
***Very highly significant (P < 0.001), **highly significant (P < 0.01), *Significant (P < 0.05) and ns=non-significant Table 6: Mean square of days to maturity and growth parameters of garlic at Debere Berhan during 2107/18 cropping season.
***Very highly significant (P < 0.001), **highly significant (P < 0.01), *Significant (P < 0.05) and ns=non-significant Table 6: Mean square of days to maturity and growth parameters of garlic at Debere Berhan during 2107/18 cropping season.
Where, DM: Days To Maturity, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, ND: Neck Diameter and SDW : Shoot Dry Weight Table 7: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on growth parameters of garlic at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Where, DM: Days To Maturity, PH: Plant Height, LL: Leaf Length, ND: Neck Diameter and SDW : Shoot Dry Weight Table 7: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on growth parameters of garlic at Debre Berhan during 2017/18 cropping season.
Table 8: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on bulb length and diameter, clove diameter and length, average clove weight and clove number per bulb.
Table 8: Effect of fungicide types and methods of application on bulb length and diameter, clove diameter and length, average clove weight and clove number per bulb.
Where, BDM: Bulb Dry Matter, TDB: Total Dry Biomass, ABW: Average Bulb Weight Table 9: Effect of fungicide and method of application on bulbs dry matter, total dry biomass yield, harvesting index, average bulb weight per plots and yield per hectare of garlic.
Where, BDM: Bulb Dry Matter, TDB: Total Dry Biomass, ABW: Average Bulb Weight Table 9: Effect of fungicide and method of application on bulbs dry matter, total dry biomass yield, harvesting index, average bulb weight per plots and yield per hectare of garlic.
Related topics:
BiologyMicrobiology and Plant Pathology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved