Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Dora Ventura

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 3. Neuropsychological performance in patients and controls of sample 2

Table 3 Neuropsychological performance in patients and controls of sample 2

Related Figures (9)

visual memory (Pattern Recognition Memory [PRM]) were administered to all of the groups. The remaining tests were applied as the following: tasks of sustained attention (Rapid Visual Processing [RVP]) and spatial Nine CANTAB subtests were selected. Tasks that measure working memory (Spatial Span [SSP]) and
visual memory (Pattern Recognition Memory [PRM]) were administered to all of the groups. The remaining tests were applied as the following: tasks of sustained attention (Rapid Visual Processing [RVP]) and spatial Nine CANTAB subtests were selected. Tasks that measure working memory (Spatial Span [SSP]) and
Figure 2. Correlation between working memory and age for backward visual span length. The size of the circles represents the number at each data point. Figure 1. Correlation between working memory and age for forward visual span length. The size of the circles represents th« number of children at each data point.
Figure 2. Correlation between working memory and age for backward visual span length. The size of the circles represents the number at each data point. Figure 1. Correlation between working memory and age for forward visual span length. The size of the circles represents th« number of children at each data point.
SD, standard deviation; ms, milliseconds. Table 2. Correlations between age and test results for children
SD, standard deviation; ms, milliseconds. Table 2. Correlations between age and test results for children
Figure 3. Percentage of correct responses in the CANTAB PRM test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002). In the visual memory subtests, we found interes ing results. The PRM subtest did not show a correlation between age and performance, but the DMS sub showed this correlation. These subtests differ in t measurement of visual memory. The DMS sub utilizes complex stimuli in which shape, color, and t combination are relevant for discrimination. In the P subtest, the relevant aspect of the stimulus is only test heir test heir RM the
Figure 3. Percentage of correct responses in the CANTAB PRM test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002). In the visual memory subtests, we found interes ing results. The PRM subtest did not show a correlation between age and performance, but the DMS sub showed this correlation. These subtests differ in t measurement of visual memory. The DMS sub utilizes complex stimuli in which shape, color, and t combination are relevant for discrimination. In the P subtest, the relevant aspect of the stimulus is only test heir test heir RM the
Figure 4. Span length in the CANTAB SSP test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002). shape; the color aspect is not relevant for discrimination. The greater complexity of DMS stimuli requires more attention to memorize and recognize the pattern in the future discrimination. Therefore, the DMS correlation with age reflects the development of attention with age, whereas the aspect of visual memory assessed by the PRM subtest does not exhibit a developmental trend in the 6- to 11-year age range.
Figure 4. Span length in the CANTAB SSP test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002). shape; the color aspect is not relevant for discrimination. The greater complexity of DMS stimuli requires more attention to memorize and recognize the pattern in the future discrimination. Therefore, the DMS correlation with age reflects the development of attention with age, whereas the aspect of visual memory assessed by the PRM subtest does not exhibit a developmental trend in the 6- to 11-year age range.
Table 4. Neuropsychological performance in patients and controls of sample 3
Table 4. Neuropsychological performance in patients and controls of sample 3
Figure 5. Mean moves (4-move problems) in the CANTAB SOC test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002).
Figure 5. Mean moves (4-move problems) in the CANTAB SOC test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002).
Figure 6. Stages completed in the CANTAB JED test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002).
Figure 6. Stages completed in the CANTAB JED test in children from 6 to 11 years of age. A comparison is shown between the results from the present study and data from Luciana and Nelson (2002).
Related topics:
PsychologyNeuroscience (Psychology)
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved