Academia.eduAcademia.edu

One of the easiest strategies to implement to redistribute product water within the cell is through operation with coun- tercurrent reactant flows, essentially using the MEA as an in-cell humidifier [2,11,12]. A study was conducted to deter- mine the optimum flow configuration for drier conditions (no air humidification, fuel humidification at 10°C lower than the inlet coolant temperature). The strategies tested included co- and counter-flow strategies for the three fluid streams: air, fuel, and coolant. In this case, the cell was operated with a 15°C temperature differential from inlet to outlet in the coolant stream. Operation with fuel counter-flow to air and coolant achieved the most stable performance and the lowest cell resistance. Fig. 7 shows a lifetime test run under these conditions, with no degradation observed. The other config- urations tested resulted in a steady decrease in cell voltage and the accompanying increase in cell resistance, indicating the effect was due to membrane drying, resulting in proton conductivity loss.  Fig. 5. Time to significant gas crossover (>10cm3/min at 2 bar pressure differential) as a function of inlet gas humidification for a non-optimized cell design. Air/hydrogen operation, current density: 540 mA/cm2, coolant temperature: 75°C, humidification levels of reactant streams as indicated.

Figure 7 One of the easiest strategies to implement to redistribute product water within the cell is through operation with coun- tercurrent reactant flows, essentially using the MEA as an in-cell humidifier [2,11,12]. A study was conducted to deter- mine the optimum flow configuration for drier conditions (no air humidification, fuel humidification at 10°C lower than the inlet coolant temperature). The strategies tested included co- and counter-flow strategies for the three fluid streams: air, fuel, and coolant. In this case, the cell was operated with a 15°C temperature differential from inlet to outlet in the coolant stream. Operation with fuel counter-flow to air and coolant achieved the most stable performance and the lowest cell resistance. Fig. 7 shows a lifetime test run under these conditions, with no degradation observed. The other config- urations tested resulted in a steady decrease in cell voltage and the accompanying increase in cell resistance, indicating the effect was due to membrane drying, resulting in proton conductivity loss. Fig. 5. Time to significant gas crossover (>10cm3/min at 2 bar pressure differential) as a function of inlet gas humidification for a non-optimized cell design. Air/hydrogen operation, current density: 540 mA/cm2, coolant temperature: 75°C, humidification levels of reactant streams as indicated.