Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 2 – uploaded by Tobias Pret

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 2. Regression Results direct effect between CSE and team satisfaction. was not supported (b=0.007, LCL=-0.056, UCL=0.086). Interestingly, we did not see a significant

Table 2 Regression Results direct effect between CSE and team satisfaction. was not supported (b=0.007, LCL=-0.056, UCL=0.086). Interestingly, we did not see a significant

Related Figures (2)

This study’s primary contribution is to present new theoretical insights into the component ‘igure 1 represents these hypothesized and tested relationships.
This study’s primary contribution is to present new theoretical insights into the component ‘igure 1 represents these hypothesized and tested relationships.
Note: nEntrepreneurs=44; nTeam=20; Mean and S.D. reported for individual entrepreneurs; Correlations for aggregated team level variables in bottom half diagonal; individual level variable correlations reported in top half diagonal; *p<0.05; **p<.01. Coll=Collaboration; CSE=Creative Self-Efficacy; CoopGl=Cooperative Goal Interdependence; CompGI=Competitive Goal Interdependence; TeamSat=Team Satisfaction Table 1. Descriptives and Correlations
Note: nEntrepreneurs=44; nTeam=20; Mean and S.D. reported for individual entrepreneurs; Correlations for aggregated team level variables in bottom half diagonal; individual level variable correlations reported in top half diagonal; *p<0.05; **p<.01. Coll=Collaboration; CSE=Creative Self-Efficacy; CoopGl=Cooperative Goal Interdependence; CompGI=Competitive Goal Interdependence; TeamSat=Team Satisfaction Table 1. Descriptives and Correlations
Related topics:
EntrepreneurshipBoard GamesNew Venture CreationSocial Interdependence Theory
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved