Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Naouma Kourti

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Figure 1.Urban centres with more than 50.000 inhabitants in the year 2015 according the degree of urbanisation applied to the GHSL data. "urban centre" database can be found in: https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ucdb2018Overview. ie ee

Figure 1 Urban centres with more than 50.000 inhabitants in the year 2015 according the degree of urbanisation applied to the GHSL data. "urban centre" database can be found in: https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ucdb2018Overview. ie ee

Related Figures (10)

Figure 2. Trajectories of built-up area ana population from 1975 to 2015 for the 10 most populated and most built-up cities in the world.
Figure 2. Trajectories of built-up area ana population from 1975 to 2015 for the 10 most populated and most built-up cities in the world.
JRC's Risk Data Hub will support the regular preparation of national risk management by member states’ authorities. It combines human settlement layer data with hazard maps and physical inventories of assets (Figure 3). National governments would then be able to add their vulnerability assessments and _ coping capacity data to carry out their risk assessments and develop risk management strategies, as called by the Union of Civil Protection Mechanism (DECISION No 1313/2013/EU).
JRC's Risk Data Hub will support the regular preparation of national risk management by member states’ authorities. It combines human settlement layer data with hazard maps and physical inventories of assets (Figure 3). National governments would then be able to add their vulnerability assessments and _ coping capacity data to carry out their risk assessments and develop risk management strategies, as called by the Union of Civil Protection Mechanism (DECISION No 1313/2013/EU).
In addition, the database confirms that most of the dwellings across Europe are located in old buildings that are reaching or have already exceeded their conventional service life. This impairs the resilience of urban areas as regards he impact of natural hazards on the built environment as well as the energy efficiency in he residential sector. Figure 4: Percentage of buildings designed without provisions for earthquake resistance (red), moderate level (yellow) and high-level (blue) seismic code (Palermo et al. 2018). environment as well as the energy efficiency in
In addition, the database confirms that most of the dwellings across Europe are located in old buildings that are reaching or have already exceeded their conventional service life. This impairs the resilience of urban areas as regards he impact of natural hazards on the built environment as well as the energy efficiency in he residential sector. Figure 4: Percentage of buildings designed without provisions for earthquake resistance (red), moderate level (yellow) and high-level (blue) seismic code (Palermo et al. 2018). environment as well as the energy efficiency in
Figure 5: Experimental testing of viaduct retrofitted with friction pendulum isolation devices (left) and braced frame with dissipative links (right).
Figure 5: Experimental testing of viaduct retrofitted with friction pendulum isolation devices (left) and braced frame with dissipative links (right).
Figure 6 Recovery of power grid in the Kumamoto Prefecture.
Figure 6 Recovery of power grid in the Kumamoto Prefecture.
Figure 7 Recovery of gas supply in the Kumamoto Prefecture 13" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1: Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 2015S BAN FLEA YE LINE NU AD Critical infrastructure systems are tightly interconnected and disruption of one infrastructure may have far reaching effects across technological systems, and jurisdictions affecting large areas and several countries. Risk assessments deal with risks at sectoral level and rarely take into account the interactions between sectors of infrastructures and systems. Building resilience in each critical infrastructure sector as well as across sectors calls for an approach that expands beyond risk assessment and requires understanding the big picture of cascade effects and impact on the society and the economy.
Figure 7 Recovery of gas supply in the Kumamoto Prefecture 13" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1: Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 2015S BAN FLEA YE LINE NU AD Critical infrastructure systems are tightly interconnected and disruption of one infrastructure may have far reaching effects across technological systems, and jurisdictions affecting large areas and several countries. Risk assessments deal with risks at sectoral level and rarely take into account the interactions between sectors of infrastructures and systems. Building resilience in each critical infrastructure sector as well as across sectors calls for an approach that expands beyond risk assessment and requires understanding the big picture of cascade effects and impact on the society and the economy.
Figure 8 Output of interdependencies analysis in GRRASP 13" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1. Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 201
Figure 8 Output of interdependencies analysis in GRRASP 13" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1. Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 201
Figure 9 RAPID-N system allows users to assess and map Natech risks locally or regionally 3" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1: Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 201 '
Figure 9 RAPID-N system allows users to assess and map Natech risks locally or regionally 3" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1: Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 201 '
Figure 11 IMPROVER resilience guidelines
Figure 11 IMPROVER resilience guidelines
Figure 10 IMPROVER resilience approach for utilities 3" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1; Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 2015S
Figure 10 IMPROVER resilience approach for utilities 3" International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP1; Seoul, South Korea, May 26-30, 2015S
Related topics:
GeographyCommunity ResilienceDisaster risk managementRisk Assessment & Risk ManagementRisk AnalysisCritical infrastructure protectionUrban resilience
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved