Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 4 – uploaded by Sabaheta Ramcilovic-Suominen

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
5.4 Towards an analytical framework for forest rule compliance (Article IV)

Table 4 5.4 Towards an analytical framework for forest rule compliance (Article IV)

Related Figures (18)

Table 1. Demographic and socio-economic information of respondents (Article II and Ill) N=226.
Table 1. Demographic and socio-economic information of respondents (Article II and Ill) N=226.
Figure 2. List of the dominant forest values identified by farmers. Percentage ot respondents (N = 226) The most dominant (in terms of the percentage of farmers who identified the specific forest values) and the most diversified forest values (in terms of the number of items of value identified) are subsistence values (e.g., food, wild crops and bushmeat), followed by environmental (e.g., water, rainfall) and economic (timber, income) values. Aesthetic and religion- related forest values were not identified by: farmers (Figure 2). rower m7 m cee oe ee
Figure 2. List of the dominant forest values identified by farmers. Percentage ot respondents (N = 226) The most dominant (in terms of the percentage of farmers who identified the specific forest values) and the most diversified forest values (in terms of the number of items of value identified) are subsistence values (e.g., food, wild crops and bushmeat), followed by environmental (e.g., water, rainfall) and economic (timber, income) values. Aesthetic and religion- related forest values were not identified by: farmers (Figure 2). rower m7 m cee oe ee
a9 aM LULYOL VOELUYO WelLy 1b LULL My £0lilivio (i 4y ULY ae The rankings of the importance of different categories of forest values, classified into use and non-use forest values (Appendix I), were found to be statistically different (Friedman test statistic for use forest values: 575.2, p=0.000, df=5, n=225; Friedman test statistic for non-use forest values: 357.5, p=0.000, df=5, n=226). Environmental, subsistence and economic values were ranked as the most important of the use forest values. They are followed by medicinal, learning, and finally aesthetic values as the least important of the use forest values.
a9 aM LULYOL VOELUYO WelLy 1b LULL My £0lilivio (i 4y ULY ae The rankings of the importance of different categories of forest values, classified into use and non-use forest values (Appendix I), were found to be statistically different (Friedman test statistic for use forest values: 575.2, p=0.000, df=5, n=225; Friedman test statistic for non-use forest values: 357.5, p=0.000, df=5, n=226). Environmental, subsistence and economic values were ranked as the most important of the use forest values. They are followed by medicinal, learning, and finally aesthetic values as the least important of the use forest values.
Table 3. Compliance with forest rules. Percentage of respondents (N=226)
Table 3. Compliance with forest rules. Percentage of respondents (N=226)
5.3.3 Factors influencing compliance with the tree-felling, farming and _ bushfire- prevention
5.3.3 Factors influencing compliance with the tree-felling, farming and _ bushfire- prevention
The framework distinguishes between the motivational context (i.e., individual motivations for or factors in compliance in which individual decisions are made. and the external variables that provide the context While the theoretical literature tends to emphasise motivations at the individual level, the emerging literature on compliance in forestry to a large extent tends to emphasise ex ternal or context-specific variables influencing compliance behaviour. There is, however, a considerable amount of correlation and likely endogenous relationships or overlap between individual-level motivations, derived from theory, and the external factors, derived from the literature on compliance in the forestry sector.
The framework distinguishes between the motivational context (i.e., individual motivations for or factors in compliance in which individual decisions are made. and the external variables that provide the context While the theoretical literature tends to emphasise motivations at the individual level, the emerging literature on compliance in forestry to a large extent tends to emphasise ex ternal or context-specific variables influencing compliance behaviour. There is, however, a considerable amount of correlation and likely endogenous relationships or overlap between individual-level motivations, derived from theory, and the external factors, derived from the literature on compliance in the forestry sector.
Part 5: Additional Comments and Information about the FLEGT VPA in Ghana
Part 5: Additional Comments and Information about the FLEGT VPA in Ghana
2. “TI will read to you different values for which one can values/cherish the forest - forest values. I would like you to rank these values in order of their importance to you. Give the participant 2-3 minutes to think and concentrate “Y ou are in the forest. What are you doing there, what do you see”? “I'd like you to take a moment and imagine yourself in the forest. If you like you may close your eyes and visualise the forest around you. (pause shortly)
2. “TI will read to you different values for which one can values/cherish the forest - forest values. I would like you to rank these values in order of their importance to you. Give the participant 2-3 minutes to think and concentrate “Y ou are in the forest. What are you doing there, what do you see”? “I'd like you to take a moment and imagine yourself in the forest. If you like you may close your eyes and visualise the forest around you. (pause shortly)
3.1. The implementation and acceptability of violation of forest rules
3.1. The implementation and acceptability of violation of forest rules
Appendix V: Forest values identified by respondents. Percentage of respondents who identified these forest values (N=226)
Appendix V: Forest values identified by respondents. Percentage of respondents who identified these forest values (N=226)
Related topics:
Sustainable LivelihoodsForestry Policy and Economics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved