Figure 1 original data to Figure 1. List of Contributors:
Related Figures (23)
Table 1: The normative and legitimate dimensions of justice principles in 1991 and 1996, principal-component score averages. achievement-based, while the other reflects the acceptance or rejection of an egalitarian view. Figure 1: Change in justice principles, 1991 and 1996. The figure clearly shows that for both periods, people deny the validity of the offered justice principles. The general illegitimacy construed from the general denial is weaker for '! Regarding the macro-level egalitarian and meritocratic value choices, we places the region’s citizens in four differing categories for both years: People are much more reluctant to allow for the marketization of the health care system, given that hardly over one-tenth of them felt it was just to be able to receive better health care The good match between macro- and mezzo-level value spectra is an important result in our Table 4: Deserved and actual income, 1991 and 1996. Showing judgments on the difference between just and actual income is only the first step in With the progress of time we can - foreseeably - anticipate the strengthening of egalitarian Figure 2 principles. Further, the model suggests that the given levels are not organically connected to Estimates of the ratio of poor, wealthy, and middle classes in the region, 1991 and 1996, percent Table 5: The cluster structure of views of society, factor scores or percent average, 1991. The cluster structure illustrates the outlines of four types. The first type feels the poor are causes of poverty, and the estimate of the ratio of the poor). feels there are even more poor, and blames external causes for this. The third type sees few we create a stable typology, with the help of three variables (i.e., the internal and external Table 6: The cluster structure of view of society in 1996, based on 1991 starting points, factor score and percent average The 1996 typology, in a visible way, resulted in a structure directly comparable with that of indicate the perception many poor, while negative values indicate the perception of few. *! With this method we increased the likelihood of creating like typologies for 1991 and 1996. According to our expectations, the profile of the region may have changed significantly. To quell our fears that using the cluster structure as the starting point would likely result in a repeat of that structure for the 1996 data, we also employed a second method for constructing a c method was to allow the cluster centers to emerge on their own, defined by theoretical considerations. T theoretical cluster initial centers were defined with lower and upper deciles of variables in the cluster an pure post-socialists and pure populists were described. The such that the pure liberals, pure conservatives, uster structure for the 1996 views of society. The gist of cluster analysis using these cluster centers brought about the same cluster structure developed based on 1991 data. 991 he hese alysis, he Table above clearly shows that while the number of social-liberals has slightly decreased Table 7: Types of views of society, 1991 and 1996, percent conservatives and post-socialists kept their ratio between 1991 and 1996. It is apparent that should one belong to the conservative or liberal view-of-society category Table 8: Types of views of society in 1991, taking into account 1996 response-structure, percent taking into account the 1996 response-structure when categorizing. Table 9: View of society types in 1991, taking into account the 1996 response structure, percent mobility” to show how, taking the 1996 opinion spectrum into account, given view-types fed ‘ategories such that the estimate of the proportion of the poor played the most important role Table 10: View-types in 1991 when taking into account the 1996 opinion spectrum In a visible manner there is no significant restructuring in the 1991-1996 relation for the liberal and conservative views. This is apparent not only through the fact that very few categories. the 1996 views of society, but which breaks the 1991 respondents in the region into unstable The second column of the table shows a virtual distribution. It is virtual in the sense that, Table 11: View-types in 1991 and 1996, percentages based on the 1991 data, but taking into account the 1996 opinion spectrum, it gives the discriminant analysis, whose logic scheme is as follows: the differing organizations of justice principles. In our case this confirmative model is Table 12: The structure of discriminant factors of view-of-society in 1991 and in 1991 taking into account the 1996 opinion spectrum there were more arguments against marketizing education in 1996 than earlier. Table 13: The structure of discriminant factors based on images of society, 1996 Table 14: The average discriminant factor score based on images of society for 1991 and for 1991 taking into account the 1996 opinion spectrum. views are somewhat nuanced. The rejection of micro- and macro-level meritocracy in these inequalities in the welfare and institutional systems. Table 15: Average discriminant factor scores based on images of society, 1996 Closing Comments Table 16: The average discriminant factor score based on images of society, among those with stable views of society, 1991 and 1996 It is important to note that the affinity of liberals and conservatives with meritocratic weight of given value choices changed among those with like views of society. earlier we reported that meritocratic value choices had lost some of their support. yersonal existential conditions and the ensuing sense of personal injustice. Though meritocratic
