Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 3 – uploaded by Sanja Simonović

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Results of discriminant analysis of objects for Serbian and Japanese participants Japanese participants. A single discriminant function of objects for Japanese participants was obtained. Standardized canonical coefficients and a structure matrix for the dimensions Beauty, Firmness and Complexity are shown in Table 4. The canonical correlation was significant: .713, y°(3) = 14.53, p<.01. As the structure matrix has shown, Beauty had the highest canonical coefficient and highest index of Structure matrix. The discriminant function correctly classified ten out of twelve Serbian architectural objects (83.3%), and two of them were misclassified into the category of Japanese architectural objects. In addition, discriminant function correctly classified nine out of twelve Japanese architectural objects (75%), while three of them were misclassified as Serbian architectural objects.

Table 4 Results of discriminant analysis of objects for Serbian and Japanese participants Japanese participants. A single discriminant function of objects for Japanese participants was obtained. Standardized canonical coefficients and a structure matrix for the dimensions Beauty, Firmness and Complexity are shown in Table 4. The canonical correlation was significant: .713, y°(3) = 14.53, p<.01. As the structure matrix has shown, Beauty had the highest canonical coefficient and highest index of Structure matrix. The discriminant function correctly classified ten out of twelve Serbian architectural objects (83.3%), and two of them were misclassified into the category of Japanese architectural objects. In addition, discriminant function correctly classified nine out of twelve Japanese architectural objects (75%), while three of them were misclassified as Serbian architectural objects.

Related Figures (6)

Figure I. Casa Guerrero, Cadiz, Spain — Alberto Campo Baeza, 2005 (left) and Casa Batlld, Barcelona, Spain — Antoni Gaudi, 1877 (right). These ‘collage-pictures’ were used as stimuli in a study of Markovié and Alfirevic (2015). Slobodan Markovic, Vladimir Stevanovié, Sanja Simonovié, and Jasmina Stevanov
Figure I. Casa Guerrero, Cadiz, Spain — Alberto Campo Baeza, 2005 (left) and Casa Batlld, Barcelona, Spain — Antoni Gaudi, 1877 (right). These ‘collage-pictures’ were used as stimuli in a study of Markovié and Alfirevic (2015). Slobodan Markovic, Vladimir Stevanovié, Sanja Simonovié, and Jasmina Stevanov
Twelve pairs of adjectives selected in Preliminary study I are shown in English, Serbian and Japanese.
Twelve pairs of adjectives selected in Preliminary study I are shown in English, Serbian and Japanese.
Results of the principal component analysis with Varimax rotation are shown. Three factors with the percent of explained variance and the loadings indexes of most loaded scales. Full titles of scales (positive and negative poles) are shown in Table I and Appendix 2.
Results of the principal component analysis with Varimax rotation are shown. Three factors with the percent of explained variance and the loadings indexes of most loaded scales. Full titles of scales (positive and negative poles) are shown in Table I and Appendix 2.
was significant, F (1, 39) = 4.03, p<.01, np? =.094 Post hoc tests (Bonferroni) indicated that this interaction is based on difference in ratings of Serbian architectural objects (p<.01), whereas the difference in ratings of Japanese objects was not significant: Japanese participants rated the Serbian objects as more fuller and complex than Serbian participants (see Figure 3). In addition, Japanese participants rated similarly both Serbian and Japanese objects (no significant difference obtained), whereas Serbian participants rated Serbian objects emptier and simpler than Japanese objects (p<.01). Figure 3. Mean ratings of Serbian and Japanese architectural objects on three dimensions of subjective experience: Beauty, Firmness and Fullness. Ratings of Serbian and Japanese participants are represented by separate lines.
was significant, F (1, 39) = 4.03, p<.01, np? =.094 Post hoc tests (Bonferroni) indicated that this interaction is based on difference in ratings of Serbian architectural objects (p<.01), whereas the difference in ratings of Japanese objects was not significant: Japanese participants rated the Serbian objects as more fuller and complex than Serbian participants (see Figure 3). In addition, Japanese participants rated similarly both Serbian and Japanese objects (no significant difference obtained), whereas Serbian participants rated Serbian objects emptier and simpler than Japanese objects (p<.01). Figure 3. Mean ratings of Serbian and Japanese architectural objects on three dimensions of subjective experience: Beauty, Firmness and Fullness. Ratings of Serbian and Japanese participants are represented by separate lines.
Results of discriminant analysis of participants for Serbian and Japanese objects Japanese objects. A single discriminant function of participants for Japanese objects was obtained. Standardized canonical coefficients and a structure matrix for the dimensions Beauty, Firmness and Complexity are shown in Table 5. The canonical correlation was significant: .655, 7°(3) = 20.99, p<.01. As the structure matrix has shown, Firmness had the highest canonical coefficient and highest index of Structure matrix. The discriminant function correctly classified sixteen out of twenty-one Serbian prticipants (76.2%), and five of them were misclassified into the category of Japanese participants. In addition, discriminant function correctly classified sixteen out of twenty Japanese participants (80%), while four of them were misclassified as Serbian participants.
Results of discriminant analysis of participants for Serbian and Japanese objects Japanese objects. A single discriminant function of participants for Japanese objects was obtained. Standardized canonical coefficients and a structure matrix for the dimensions Beauty, Firmness and Complexity are shown in Table 5. The canonical correlation was significant: .655, 7°(3) = 20.99, p<.01. As the structure matrix has shown, Firmness had the highest canonical coefficient and highest index of Structure matrix. The discriminant function correctly classified sixteen out of twenty-one Serbian prticipants (76.2%), and five of them were misclassified into the category of Japanese participants. In addition, discriminant function correctly classified sixteen out of twenty Japanese participants (80%), while four of them were misclassified as Serbian participants.
Related topics:
Art HistoryArtArchitectureArt TheoryArts EducationArchitectural EducationArchitectural HistoryHistory of ArtArchitectural TheoryArchitecture History
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved