Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 5 – uploaded by Matthew Austin

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 4: A study matrix of how the same figure of the plan reconfigures itself depending upon binary-numeric transformations of the plan. Fig. 3: A redrawing of the Barcelona Pavilion by Kieran Patrick.

Figure 4 A study matrix of how the same figure of the plan reconfigures itself depending upon binary-numeric transformations of the plan. Fig. 3: A redrawing of the Barcelona Pavilion by Kieran Patrick.

Related Figures (6)

Fig. 1: Diagram showing how an image file can be understood as a two-dimensional array and a linear sequence of values on the computer's hard or solid-state drive. ENTER THE GLITCH
Fig. 1: Diagram showing how an image file can be understood as a two-dimensional array and a linear sequence of values on the computer's hard or solid-state drive. ENTER THE GLITCH
Fig. 2: A simple example of how a text file and an image file can create the same outcome if put through specific algorithms, in this case Processing and Adobe Photoshop respectively.
Fig. 2: A simple example of how a text file and an image file can create the same outcome if put through specific algorithms, in this case Processing and Adobe Photoshop respectively.
It is evident that the glitching of a plan requires a complete reconsideration of the vertical nature of the result, and in turn the glitching of an elevation requires a reunderstanding of the plan. In fact, the glitch not only resists architectural convention, but also disrupts the relationship between architecture's different modes of representation. Further to this, architecture’s other modes of representation (such as video) constitute a difference in technology and thus glitch in a fundamentally different way. The glitch has the potential to disrupt architecture at any point within its production to force a complete reworking of what the architectural drawing intends to represent. Fig. 5: Three-dimensional reworking of a valid interpretation of the data-bent image of the plan of the Barcelona Pavilion.
It is evident that the glitching of a plan requires a complete reconsideration of the vertical nature of the result, and in turn the glitching of an elevation requires a reunderstanding of the plan. In fact, the glitch not only resists architectural convention, but also disrupts the relationship between architecture's different modes of representation. Further to this, architecture’s other modes of representation (such as video) constitute a difference in technology and thus glitch in a fundamentally different way. The glitch has the potential to disrupt architecture at any point within its production to force a complete reworking of what the architectural drawing intends to represent. Fig. 5: Three-dimensional reworking of a valid interpretation of the data-bent image of the plan of the Barcelona Pavilion.
Related topics:
ArchitectureDigital ArchitectureParametric Design (Architecture)Algorithmic ArchitectureGlitch ArtGlitch Aesthetics
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved