Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Hirofumi Kato

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
*Those with no response for both prefecture and municipality names were classified as NA. Table 3 Number of respondents from different parts of Japan (with eight regional divisions)

Table 3 *Those with no response for both prefecture and municipality names were classified as NA. Table 3 Number of respondents from different parts of Japan (with eight regional divisions)

Related Figures (47)

Photo 1 Kamuy—nomi (ritual for prayer to the deities) held at a newly discovered casi near Benzai Bay® (with Koji Yuki and Masayoshi Hayasaka serving as priests) extracted from archaeological finds in their roles as cultural resources. Archaeological resources highlight the history of the literature—free prehistoric age, and thei: interpretation significantly affects the way they are displayed at museums. Kenji Yoshida (2000 maintains that the period of conventional exhibition of other cultures is over, while that o: exhibition of one’s own culture has now begun. He also observes that collaboration witl communities to which exhibits belong is necessary in the exhibition preparation phase (Yoshidé 2000). There are more opportunities for the interpretation of archaeological resources than fo! artifacts already held by museums. The involvement of communities in the processes fron excavation to exhibition to status as part of museum collections allows the maximum value to be aytracted fram archaenlangical finde in their ralee ae cultural recanreec
Photo 1 Kamuy—nomi (ritual for prayer to the deities) held at a newly discovered casi near Benzai Bay® (with Koji Yuki and Masayoshi Hayasaka serving as priests) extracted from archaeological finds in their roles as cultural resources. Archaeological resources highlight the history of the literature—free prehistoric age, and thei: interpretation significantly affects the way they are displayed at museums. Kenji Yoshida (2000 maintains that the period of conventional exhibition of other cultures is over, while that o: exhibition of one’s own culture has now begun. He also observes that collaboration witl communities to which exhibits belong is necessary in the exhibition preparation phase (Yoshidé 2000). There are more opportunities for the interpretation of archaeological resources than fo! artifacts already held by museums. The involvement of communities in the processes fron excavation to exhibition to status as part of museum collections allows the maximum value to be aytracted fram archaenlangical finde in their ralee ae cultural recanreec
properly understand the aspects of culture they learn about from guides. such tours with Ainu guides will provide opportunities for people to appreciate the harmonious
properly understand the aspects of culture they learn about from guides. such tours with Ainu guides will provide opportunities for people to appreciate the harmonious
cultural properties that surround us as part of our shared cultural heritage. Hokkaido will maintain pride in the history and culture of their region and cherish the variety «
cultural properties that surround us as part of our shared cultural heritage. Hokkaido will maintain pride in the history and culture of their region and cherish the variety «
Table 1. Flow of heritage trail development
Table 1. Flow of heritage trail development
The next section details the characteristics of each period based on the table above. 2. Preparation Period (April 2009 — February 2010)
The next section details the characteristics of each period based on the table above. 2. Preparation Period (April 2009 — February 2010)
Fig. | Map of the Central Utoro Course (Source: authors; base map source: Google Earth) Fig. 1 Map of the Central Utoro Course Course discussed above). Figure 1 shows the trail route connecting the tour spots. (Source: authors; base map source: Google Earth)
Fig. | Map of the Central Utoro Course (Source: authors; base map source: Google Earth) Fig. 1 Map of the Central Utoro Course Course discussed above). Figure 1 shows the trail route connecting the tour spots. (Source: authors; base map source: Google Earth)
Fig. 2 Heritage trail database structure members carefully examined link—target websites with reference to the EOL system. 6 http://www.wikipedia.org 7 http://www.eol.org
Fig. 2 Heritage trail database structure members carefully examined link—target websites with reference to the EOL system. 6 http://www.wikipedia.org 7 http://www.eol.org
Fig. 3 Part of a presentation given during the training course on the use of GPS equipment
Fig. 3 Part of a presentation given during the training course on the use of GPS equipment
Fig. 4 Map of the Shojin River and Tenjin—yama Casi Course (Southern Hiragishi area) at spots 4 and 5. provided along the Shojin River (No. 4). In terms of content, the course focused on Ainu culture
Fig. 4 Map of the Shojin River and Tenjin—yama Casi Course (Southern Hiragishi area) at spots 4 and 5. provided along the Shojin River (No. 4). In terms of content, the course focused on Ainu culture
Table 2 Tour spots on the Shojin River and Tenjin—yama Casi Course
Table 2 Tour spots on the Shojin River and Tenjin—yama Casi Course
(Source: authors; image sources (from left): Google’s Picasa Web Album, Apple website, authors) The model tour was based on the three-step process shown in Fig. 5. 4—2. Model-tour process
(Source: authors; image sources (from left): Google’s Picasa Web Album, Apple website, authors) The model tour was based on the three-step process shown in Fig. 5. 4—2. Model-tour process
Fig. 6 Picasa Web Album start screen only to WG members rather than to the general public. uploaded to the Picasa website as shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6 Picasa Web Album start screen only to WG members rather than to the general public. uploaded to the Picasa website as shown in Fig. 6.
Utoro Course was operated on September 25 and 26, 2010 (Fig. 7). The implementation of the model tour for the Central Utoro Course was significant in two 4-3. Model tour for the Central Utoro Course respects: it represented a concerted effort to address the problems identified from the Shojit
Utoro Course was operated on September 25 and 26, 2010 (Fig. 7). The implementation of the model tour for the Central Utoro Course was significant in two 4-3. Model tour for the Central Utoro Course respects: it represented a concerted effort to address the problems identified from the Shojit
Fig. 8 Guide map for the Archaeological Site and Fishery Course in the Shiretoko Utoro Area (Source: authors)
Fig. 8 Guide map for the Archaeological Site and Fishery Course in the Shiretoko Utoro Area (Source: authors)
*1 No survey work was conducted on September 15, 2009. Table 1 Daily number of respondents during the questionnaire survey periods
*1 No survey work was conducted on September 15, 2009. Table 1 Daily number of respondents during the questionnaire survey periods
Table 2 Number of respondents staying in Utoro for each number of days less than a week
Table 2 Number of respondents staying in Utoro for each number of days less than a week
*The 2009 total exceeds the number of respondents because multiple choices were allowed. Table 4 Impressions of Utoro (unit: no. of people)
*The 2009 total exceeds the number of respondents because multiple choices were allowed. Table 4 Impressions of Utoro (unit: no. of people)
Table 5 Impressions of Utoro (by place of residence; unit: no. of people) ‘1 In 2009, 11 respondents provided no information on their place of residence and 4 did not specify the Hokkaido municipality where they lived. These numbers are not included in the total. The corresponding figures for 2010 were 7 and 0, respectively. These are also not includec in the total. impressions of Utoro among any respondent attributes at the 5 percent significance level.
Table 5 Impressions of Utoro (by place of residence; unit: no. of people) ‘1 In 2009, 11 respondents provided no information on their place of residence and 4 did not specify the Hokkaido municipality where they lived. These numbers are not included in the total. The corresponding figures for 2010 were 7 and 0, respectively. These are also not includec in the total. impressions of Utoro among any respondent attributes at the 5 percent significance level.
Table 6 Test results showing differences in impressions of Utoro by place of residence
Table 6 Test results showing differences in impressions of Utoro by place of residence
Table 7 Impressions of Utoro (by age group; unit: no. of people)
Table 7 Impressions of Utoro (by age group; unit: no. of people)
Table 8 Test results showing differences in impressions of Utoro by age group
Table 8 Test results showing differences in impressions of Utoro by age group
Table 9 Recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro (by place of residence; unit: no. of people) 7 Taking data for respondents living in Hokkaido and those living elsewhere in 2009 as an example, the chi-square (X2) value was 4.28477901329578. As this is greater than the upper boundary value (X2 (0.95); 3.84145882069412) for the 5 percent significance level in chi-square distribution with 1 degree of freedom, the null hypothesis is rejected. As the P value (0.0384550812316836) is less than the 5 percent level of significance, the null hypothesis is also rejected. Consequently, it can be concluded that there was a significant difference between those living in Hokkaido and those living elsewhere in 2009.
Table 9 Recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro (by place of residence; unit: no. of people) 7 Taking data for respondents living in Hokkaido and those living elsewhere in 2009 as an example, the chi-square (X2) value was 4.28477901329578. As this is greater than the upper boundary value (X2 (0.95); 3.84145882069412) for the 5 percent significance level in chi-square distribution with 1 degree of freedom, the null hypothesis is rejected. As the P value (0.0384550812316836) is less than the 5 percent level of significance, the null hypothesis is also rejected. Consequently, it can be concluded that there was a significant difference between those living in Hokkaido and those living elsewhere in 2009.
Table 11 Recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro (by age group; unit: no. of people) are familiar with them.
Table 11 Recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro (by age group; unit: no. of people) are familiar with them.
Table 10 Test results showing recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro by place of residence
Table 10 Test results showing recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro by place of residence
Table 12 Test results showing recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro by age group
Table 12 Test results showing recognition of archaeological sites in Utoro by age group
Table 14 Points of particular interest at the excavation news-—flash exhibition of 2010 (unit: no. of people)
Table 14 Points of particular interest at the excavation news-—flash exhibition of 2010 (unit: no. of people)
Table 13 Feedback on the excavation news-—flash exhibition of 2009 (unit: no. of people) Kesponses to a question in the 2U1U questionnaire asking what respondents found the mo nteresting at the exhibition showed that a reconstructed bear ritual site was the most popular (6 eople; 32%), followed by earthenware and stoneware. Other answers (lecture room, guic ommentary, bear skull, and nothing in particular) were selected by one respondent each (Tab [4). The reconstructed bear ritual site is made up of structural remnants excavated at the Casi ‘ot—etu B Site during a Hokkaido University survey in 2005. As the rituals it highlights an yther aspects of the culture are considered similar to those of the Ainu iomante (a ritual fc ending the spirit of bears to heaven), it can be seen as a valuable resource in consideration he development of the Ainu culture and relationships with the Okhotsk culture. the development of the Ainu culture and relationships with the Okhotsk culture. sending the spirit of bears to heaven), it can be seen as a valuable resource in consideration of
Table 13 Feedback on the excavation news-—flash exhibition of 2009 (unit: no. of people) Kesponses to a question in the 2U1U questionnaire asking what respondents found the mo nteresting at the exhibition showed that a reconstructed bear ritual site was the most popular (6 eople; 32%), followed by earthenware and stoneware. Other answers (lecture room, guic ommentary, bear skull, and nothing in particular) were selected by one respondent each (Tab [4). The reconstructed bear ritual site is made up of structural remnants excavated at the Casi ‘ot—etu B Site during a Hokkaido University survey in 2005. As the rituals it highlights an yther aspects of the culture are considered similar to those of the Ainu iomante (a ritual fc ending the spirit of bears to heaven), it can be seen as a valuable resource in consideration he development of the Ainu culture and relationships with the Okhotsk culture. the development of the Ainu culture and relationships with the Okhotsk culture. sending the spirit of bears to heaven), it can be seen as a valuable resource in consideration of
Table 15 Reasons for wanting to take part in hands—on archaeological events by degree of interest (unit: no. of people) Table 16 Levels of interest in taking part in hands—on archaeological events by level of recognition for archaeological sites in Utoro (unit: no. of people)
Table 15 Reasons for wanting to take part in hands—on archaeological events by degree of interest (unit: no. of people) Table 16 Levels of interest in taking part in hands—on archaeological events by level of recognition for archaeological sites in Utoro (unit: no. of people)
Table 17 Test results showing differences between levels of recognition for archaeological sites in Utoro and levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events
Table 17 Test results showing differences between levels of recognition for archaeological sites in Utoro and levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events
Table 18 Levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by place of residence (unit: no. of n Table 19 Test results showing differences in levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events bi place of residence difference was observed at the 5 percent significance level between those living in easterr
Table 18 Levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by place of residence (unit: no. of n Table 19 Test results showing differences in levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events bi place of residence difference was observed at the 5 percent significance level between those living in easterr
Table 20 Levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by age group (unit: no. of people)
Table 20 Levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by age group (unit: no. of people)
Table 21 Test results showing differences in levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by age group
Table 21 Test results showing differences in levels of interest in hands—on archaeological events by age group
questions and comments recorded in notebooks. reconstructed animal ritual site proved very
questions and comments recorded in notebooks. reconstructed animal ritual site proved very
Photo 3 Map of cultural heritage sites in Utoro
Photo 3 Map of cultural heritage sites in Utoro
Table 1 Levels of visitor satisfaction Table 2 Levels of exhibit—friendliness to visitors
Table 1 Levels of visitor satisfaction Table 2 Levels of exhibit—friendliness to visitors
each other based on cultural heritage resources.
each other based on cultural heritage resources.
Fig. 3 Relationships linking cultural heritage and the Utoro host community and how? These questions are discussed here based on the conceptual representation shown
Fig. 3 Relationships linking cultural heritage and the Utoro host community and how? These questions are discussed here based on the conceptual representation shown
Photo 4 Hands-on archeological excavation
Photo 4 Hands-on archeological excavation
Photo 5 Godzilla Rock (front center). There is a passable space between the rock and the one immediately behind it. Godzilla Rock
Photo 5 Godzilla Rock (front center). There is a passable space between the rock and the one immediately behind it. Godzilla Rock
Photo 1 Prof. Joe Watkins demonstrates stone tool making from viewing the finished stone tools. ! Doctoral degree program at the Keio University Graduate School of Letters mentioning the delicate sparkle of obsidian and the beauty of the arrowhead. As the visitors
Photo 1 Prof. Joe Watkins demonstrates stone tool making from viewing the finished stone tools. ! Doctoral degree program at the Keio University Graduate School of Letters mentioning the delicate sparkle of obsidian and the beauty of the arrowhead. As the visitors
Photo 1 Participauts of the Symposium 2012 management that involves collaboration with local residents and indigenous people.
Photo 1 Participauts of the Symposium 2012 management that involves collaboration with local residents and indigenous people.
Related topics:
Cultural StudiesIndigenous Archaeology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved