Figure 3 – uploaded by Nilgün AVCI

See full PDF downloadDownload figure

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin =0,888; Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity = 1700,371; Cumulative Variance: 54,803 Table 3: Quality of Work Life Factor Analysis Table — Table 3 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin =0,888; Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity = 1700,371; Cumulative Variance: 54,803 Table 3: Quality of Work Life Factor Analysis Table

Related Figures (6)

Table 1: Participant Profile 4.2. EFA for the Coworker Support Descriptive statistics of the sample demographics are on the Table 1. It is seen that 59,1% of the participants are men, 69,8% is single and 56,3% university degree.

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin =0,935; Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity = 1574,918 ; Cumulative Variance: 42,012

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin =0,867; Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity = 1081,787 ; Cumulative Variance: 58,344 Table 4: Wellbeing Factor Analysis Table

**The correlation is significant at the ,0O1 level. Table 5: Coworker Support; Work Life Quality and Wellbeing Correlation Table To see the effect of the coworker support, and QWL on wellbeing, regression analyse have been used. As seen on the table model summary, 38,3% of the change in wellbeing is included independent variables in the model. The relationship between variables is high (R: 0,619) and positively.

a Predictors: (Constant), QWL2, Coworker Support, QWL1 Table 6: Coworker Support, Work Life Quality and Wellbeing Regression Model Summary Table

a Dependent Variable: Wellbeing Table 7: Coworker Support; Work Life Quality and Wellbeing Regression Table