Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Ezzatollah Asgharizadeh

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Furthermore, we assume the following weight vector w: W = 44, 2, 1) A pairwise comparison of the information in impact matrixes leads to the following regime matrixes as Eq. )).

Table 6 Furthermore, we assume the following weight vector w: W = 44, 2, 1) A pairwise comparison of the information in impact matrixes leads to the following regime matrixes as Eq. )).

Related Figures (15)

Table 1: A summary of supply chain performance measurement frameworks
Table 1: A summary of supply chain performance measurement frameworks
Table4:Impact matrix for Reliability dimension
Table4:Impact matrix for Reliability dimension
Table5 - Impact matrix for Flexibility (Agility) dimension
Table5 - Impact matrix for Flexibility (Agility) dimension
Table6: Impact matrix for Responsiveness dimension
Table6: Impact matrix for Responsiveness dimension
Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward second attribute, time needed for investigating alternatives, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward first attribute, effect on the goal of supply chain performance measurement, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward third attribute, cost of investigating attributes, is presented as follows:
Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward second attribute, time needed for investigating alternatives, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward first attribute, effect on the goal of supply chain performance measurement, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the efficiency dimension toward third attribute, cost of investigating attributes, is presented as follows:
Regime ‘matrix for the flexibility dimension toward second attribute, time needed for investigating attributes, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the flexibility dimension toward first attribute, effect on the goal of supply chain performance measurement, is presented as follows:
Regime ‘matrix for the flexibility dimension toward second attribute, time needed for investigating attributes, is presented as follows: Regime matrix for the flexibility dimension toward first attribute, effect on the goal of supply chain performance measurement, is presented as follows:
Regime matrix for the Responsiveness dimension toward third attribute, cost of investigating attributes, is presented as follows:
Regime matrix for the Responsiveness dimension toward third attribute, cost of investigating attributes, is presented as follows:
For the efficiency dimension V;; table is as follow: By using Eq. (7) and (8) it’s directly derived Pj that shown the total dominance of each choice option; via Pj values it's possible that compare supply chain performance measurement criterion. The following final ranking of alternatives results are demonstrated in table 7.
For the efficiency dimension V;; table is as follow: By using Eq. (7) and (8) it’s directly derived Pj that shown the total dominance of each choice option; via Pj values it's possible that compare supply chain performance measurement criterion. The following final ranking of alternatives results are demonstrated in table 7.
Table7: Ranking supply chain performance measures
Table7: Ranking supply chain performance measures
Figure 1: Comparison between dimensions of supply chain performance It's obviously that reliability of performance has the highest score and flexibility of that has the lowest score; taking into account the above results, management should focus more on flexibility dimension of supply chain performance. The results assist the supply chain managers to both make crucial decisions related with the main operations. Plans for improving flexibility should be created. In addition, figure Idisplays the comparison between terminal scores of supply chain performance in four dimensions.
Figure 1: Comparison between dimensions of supply chain performance It's obviously that reliability of performance has the highest score and flexibility of that has the lowest score; taking into account the above results, management should focus more on flexibility dimension of supply chain performance. The results assist the supply chain managers to both make crucial decisions related with the main operations. Plans for improving flexibility should be created. In addition, figure Idisplays the comparison between terminal scores of supply chain performance in four dimensions.
Table’: supply chain performance measurement ofEfficiency cost & asset dimension Table9: supply chain performance measurement of Reliability dimension
Table’: supply chain performance measurement ofEfficiency cost & asset dimension Table9: supply chain performance measurement of Reliability dimension
Table10: supply chain performance measurement of Flexibility dimension
Table10: supply chain performance measurement of Flexibility dimension
Table11: supply chain performance measurement of Responsiveness dimension
Table11: supply chain performance measurement of Responsiveness dimension
Related topics:
Supply Chain Risk ManagementSupply Chain ModelingSupply Chain Performance Management
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved