Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 40 – uploaded by Nareerut Jariyapunya

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 4.34 The correlation of the strain prediction of the sample S7 with different testing devices

Table 4 34 The correlation of the strain prediction of the sample S7 with different testing devices

Related Figures (121)

will be represented in a form of numbers and their definitions are described afterwards. Figure 2.1 The basic plain method for patternmaking [38, 39] plain’s column will be represented in letters while, at the vertical plain column, each plain
will be represented in a form of numbers and their definitions are described afterwards. Figure 2.1 The basic plain method for patternmaking [38, 39] plain’s column will be represented in letters while, at the vertical plain column, each plain
Figure 2.2 The basic block patternmaking for compression garment in vertical and horizontal plains.
Figure 2.2 The basic block patternmaking for compression garment in vertical and horizontal plains.
Table 2.1 The acceptance of the pressure value range of CG by literatures
Table 2.1 The acceptance of the pressure value range of CG by literatures
cutting and sewing Figure 2.3 Fabric grain lines where the pattern was used the direction for cutting provides the appropriate or specific pressure [27].
cutting and sewing Figure 2.3 Fabric grain lines where the pattern was used the direction for cutting provides the appropriate or specific pressure [27].
Surface tension T pulls at this rectangle from all four directions, while the curve of the contribute analogously to the normal force as shown in the Figure 2.4 (b).
Surface tension T pulls at this rectangle from all four directions, while the curve of the contribute analogously to the normal force as shown in the Figure 2.4 (b).
Figure 2.5 The cylindrical vessels free-body diagram of the thin-walled pressure vessels [78]
Figure 2.5 The cylindrical vessels free-body diagram of the thin-walled pressure vessels [78]
Figure 2.6 The PicoPress® devise of the interface pressure measurement system used to measure the interface pressure under compression of clothing pressure.
Figure 2.6 The PicoPress® devise of the interface pressure measurement system used to measure the interface pressure under compression of clothing pressure.
Figure 2.7 Schematic representation of the interface perturbation effect of a sensor placed beneath an extensible bandage over a curved surface [83, 22]
Figure 2.7 Schematic representation of the interface perturbation effect of a sensor placed beneath an extensible bandage over a curved surface [83, 22]
Table 2.2 The classification of elastic fibre fabric into three classifications, they can be classified into low, medium and high [8, 9].
Table 2.2 The classification of elastic fibre fabric into three classifications, they can be classified into low, medium and high [8, 9].
Table 2.3 Comparison of appearance and properties of knitted structures [93] stockings and tight-fitting garment and CG.
Table 2.3 Comparison of appearance and properties of knitted structures [93] stockings and tight-fitting garment and CG.
Figure 2.8 Typical stress-strain diagram indicating the various stages of deformation [98]. has the influence on the material deformation.
Figure 2.8 Typical stress-strain diagram indicating the various stages of deformation [98]. has the influence on the material deformation.
[99, 100] as shown in the Figure 2.9 (a and b). The results of the fabric deformations are simultaneous and depend on each fabrics force, whilst the transverse deformation (contraction) takes place in the transverse direction
[99, 100] as shown in the Figure 2.9 (a and b). The results of the fabric deformations are simultaneous and depend on each fabrics force, whilst the transverse deformation (contraction) takes place in the transverse direction
Figure 2.10 Typical load-extension characteristic curve for a weft-knitted fabric [101] characteristic curve for a weft knitted fabric tested in the walewise direction [101]. The critical stretch state or jamming state, which is a hypothetical state of deformation.
Figure 2.10 Typical load-extension characteristic curve for a weft-knitted fabric [101] characteristic curve for a weft knitted fabric tested in the walewise direction [101]. The critical stretch state or jamming state, which is a hypothetical state of deformation.
Figure 2.11 Typical cycling graph [100] maximum at 50% [8, 10, 105, 106].
Figure 2.11 Typical cycling graph [100] maximum at 50% [8, 10, 105, 106].
Figure 2.12 Graph of force and elongation in hysteresis loops [106] elongation in hysteresis loops in the loading and unloading cycle [106, 107] is shown
Figure 2.12 Graph of force and elongation in hysteresis loops [106] elongation in hysteresis loops in the loading and unloading cycle [106, 107] is shown
Figure 2.13 Stress response to the stress relaxation test [108] 2.6.12 Dynamic work recovery
Figure 2.13 Stress response to the stress relaxation test [108] 2.6.12 Dynamic work recovery
iscoelastic deformation, which will produce hysteresis loop as shown in the Figure 2.14.
iscoelastic deformation, which will produce hysteresis loop as shown in the Figure 2.14.
Table 3.1. Elastic knitted fabrics characteristics 3.2 Methods were obtained.
Table 3.1. Elastic knitted fabrics characteristics 3.2 Methods were obtained.
Figure 3.1 A schematic flowchart of the procedure patternmaking development for stretch fabrics
Figure 3.1 A schematic flowchart of the procedure patternmaking development for stretch fabrics
Table 3.2 Women body measurements of the mannequin
Table 3.2 Women body measurements of the mannequin
Figure 3.2 The women body measurement chart
Figure 3.2 The women body measurement chart
Figure 3.3 The 3D images with point marks using sense™2 3D scanner
Figure 3.3 The 3D images with point marks using sense™2 3D scanner
3.3.2 Analysis of patternmaking for pressure garments
3.3.2 Analysis of patternmaking for pressure garments
Figure 3.5 Conventional block pattern relationship to the body measurement
Figure 3.5 Conventional block pattern relationship to the body measurement
Figure 3.6 Analysis patternmaking for pressure garment based on pressure area patternmaking according to pressure requirement. measurement of the pressure area and method are described in order to develop 1
Figure 3.6 Analysis patternmaking for pressure garment based on pressure area patternmaking according to pressure requirement. measurement of the pressure area and method are described in order to develop 1
Figure 3.7 The deformation changed of stretch fabric of circumferential and lateral strain
Figure 3.7 The deformation changed of stretch fabric of circumferential and lateral strain
Figure 3.8 Schematic diagram of patternmakins development relate to a circle shape [110]
Figure 3.8 Schematic diagram of patternmakins development relate to a circle shape [110]
2D Pattern construction net 3D construction garment formula by multiplying the elastic coefficient from the equation (3.9) is as follows: Figure 3.9 Construction abscissa of 2D pattern net and 3D garment abscissa including the bust part and the development method of the construction abscissa
2D Pattern construction net 3D construction garment formula by multiplying the elastic coefficient from the equation (3.9) is as follows: Figure 3.9 Construction abscissa of 2D pattern net and 3D garment abscissa including the bust part and the development method of the construction abscissa
Figure 3.10 Schematic diagram the tensile testing machine
Figure 3.10 Schematic diagram the tensile testing machine
Figure 3.11 The setting method for testing stress relaxation determining method of stress relaxation.
Figure 3.11 The setting method for testing stress relaxation determining method of stress relaxation.
Dynamic work recovery of elastic fabric different cycle cycle to calculate the DWR% and comparison.
Dynamic work recovery of elastic fabric different cycle cycle to calculate the DWR% and comparison.
Figure 3.13 Experimental for setup for image analysis camera of 50 cm as shown the Figure 3.13 [113].
Figure 3.13 Experimental for setup for image analysis camera of 50 cm as shown the Figure 3.13 [113].
However, after the deformation, the line becomes as a smooth curve. ody. Figure 3.14 shows the straight line drawn on the undeformed configuration of a solid. this curve, the segment would be straight in the undeformed configuration and almost straight in the deformed configuration. Thus, no matter how complex a deformation we 3.4.2.2 Concept of gradient deformation tensor: The concepts of gradient deformation
However, after the deformation, the line becomes as a smooth curve. ody. Figure 3.14 shows the straight line drawn on the undeformed configuration of a solid. this curve, the segment would be straight in the undeformed configuration and almost straight in the deformed configuration. Thus, no matter how complex a deformation we 3.4.2.2 Concept of gradient deformation tensor: The concepts of gradient deformation
Figure 3.15 Image processing steps [113] 3.5 Applying the Laplace’s law for CG and evaluating the pressure converting a gray-scale input image to a binary image. The purpose of thresholding is to
Figure 3.15 Image processing steps [113] 3.5 Applying the Laplace’s law for CG and evaluating the pressure converting a gray-scale input image to a binary image. The purpose of thresholding is to
Figure 3.16 Fabric stretch showing the force directions on the cylindrical model plane. In the one-direction force acts with two nearly opposite forces of magnitude is F, each
Figure 3.16 Fabric stretch showing the force directions on the cylindrical model plane. In the one-direction force acts with two nearly opposite forces of magnitude is F, each
cylindrical model as shown in the Figure 3.18. The pressure value on the sensor can be applied from the equation (3.26) and used the tension
cylindrical model as shown in the Figure 3.18. The pressure value on the sensor can be applied from the equation (3.26) and used the tension
Figure 3.19 The sensor of compression tester acting under fabric stretched on the cylindrical model [6] estimate the pressure perturbation or coefficient of pressure perturbation (Cpp). overestimation [83]. As proposed by [22] in the model, equation (3.37) was applied tc overestimation of pressure had occurred as shown in the Figure 3.19. Thus, to eradicate the
Figure 3.19 The sensor of compression tester acting under fabric stretched on the cylindrical model [6] estimate the pressure perturbation or coefficient of pressure perturbation (Cpp). overestimation [83]. As proposed by [22] in the model, equation (3.37) was applied tc overestimation of pressure had occurred as shown in the Figure 3.19. Thus, to eradicate the
Figure 3.20 The Schematic design of the tensile measurement device measurement device are shown as follows:
Figure 3.20 The Schematic design of the tensile measurement device measurement device are shown as follows:
Figure 3.21 The experimental design and testing of manual tensile testing device is measured until the fabric elongation reaches 50% on each cycle from 1 to 5 cycle times.
Figure 3.21 The experimental design and testing of manual tensile testing device is measured until the fabric elongation reaches 50% on each cycle from 1 to 5 cycle times.
Figure 3.22 The experimental design for capturing the images from manual tensile testing device Elements - Imaging Software.
Figure 3.22 The experimental design for capturing the images from manual tensile testing device Elements - Imaging Software.
4.1.2 Physical testing for performance and serviceability of fabrics structure of knitted fabrics were determined as per standard testing methods shown in the
4.1.2 Physical testing for performance and serviceability of fabrics structure of knitted fabrics were determined as per standard testing methods shown in the
locknit structure does have the highest force value in wale and course directions.
locknit structure does have the highest force value in wale and course directions.
Figure 4.1 Graphs of force-elongation characteristics in different direction: (b) Graph force-elongation in course direction
Figure 4.1 Graphs of force-elongation characteristics in different direction: (b) Graph force-elongation in course direction
Table 4.2 Elastic knitted fabrics characteristics of maximum force and elongation at fracture 4.1.2.2 Stress and strain behaviour: Referring results of force-elongation curves, they were *xtensibility values than single jersey and interlock of knitted fabrics structures when
Table 4.2 Elastic knitted fabrics characteristics of maximum force and elongation at fracture 4.1.2.2 Stress and strain behaviour: Referring results of force-elongation curves, they were *xtensibility values than single jersey and interlock of knitted fabrics structures when
The graphs in Figure 4.2 (a, b and c) illustrates the stress-strain curves in wale, course and
The graphs in Figure 4.2 (a, b and c) illustrates the stress-strain curves in wale, course and
Figure 4.2 Graphs Stress-strain different directions of 8 samples
Figure 4.2 Graphs Stress-strain different directions of 8 samples
Table 4.3 The properties of UTS, strain and Young’s modulus with difference directions
Table 4.3 The properties of UTS, strain and Young’s modulus with difference directions
Figure 4.3 The hysteresis loops 5" cycle of S7 in course direction patternmaking at the maximum 50% of the actual size of block pattern. experiment was determined the limit of patternmaking allow for reduction size ot
Figure 4.3 The hysteresis loops 5" cycle of S7 in course direction patternmaking at the maximum 50% of the actual size of block pattern. experiment was determined the limit of patternmaking allow for reduction size ot
Table 4.4 The elasticity properties of knitted fabrics in course direction
Table 4.4 The elasticity properties of knitted fabrics in course direction
Figure 4.4 Graphs comparative the influence of elastane composition on force decay and elastic recovery Note: “+”is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.4 Graphs comparative the influence of elastane composition on force decay and elastic recovery Note: “+”is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Table 4.5 The One-way ANOVA analysis of influence effect of the elastane on force decay and elasticity 4.1.2.4 Stress relaxation: Stress relaxation is considered as one of the main factors that may take an effect on compression garment. Concerning the time of stretching, when the fabric
Table 4.5 The One-way ANOVA analysis of influence effect of the elastane on force decay and elasticity 4.1.2.4 Stress relaxation: Stress relaxation is considered as one of the main factors that may take an effect on compression garment. Concerning the time of stretching, when the fabric
Figure 4.5 Comparative the stress relaxation over the time wearing on the body. should be considered in order to help the fabric keep constant the pressure value durir
Figure 4.5 Comparative the stress relaxation over the time wearing on the body. should be considered in order to help the fabric keep constant the pressure value durir
Figure 4.6 Graphs of Dynamic Work Recovery at the fifth cycle of eight samples the energy loss in fabric.
Figure 4.6 Graphs of Dynamic Work Recovery at the fifth cycle of eight samples the energy loss in fabric.
Note: “+”is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Note: “+”is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.7 (1-d) shows the simulated images without extension, 30 % extension in tensor deformation values also change in similar percentage with respect to the applied
Figure 4.7 (1-d) shows the simulated images without extension, 30 % extension in tensor deformation values also change in similar percentage with respect to the applied
Figure 4.8 Gradient deformation tensor for course direction by tensile testing machine
Figure 4.8 Gradient deformation tensor for course direction by tensile testing machine
Table 4.8 Results of gradient tensor deformation in vertical direction and the results are obtained as shown in Table 4.8.
Table 4.8 Results of gradient tensor deformation in vertical direction and the results are obtained as shown in Table 4.8.
the (Fsisnificance<0.05) are given in Table 4.9.
the (Fsisnificance<0.05) are given in Table 4.9.
Figure 4.9 Deformation behaviour of stretch fabric of the sample S6 Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.9 Deformation behaviour of stretch fabric of the sample S6 Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.10 The comparative the stress values between TS and ES analysis was successful and evident enough to prove the stress values.
Figure 4.10 The comparative the stress values between TS and ES analysis was successful and evident enough to prove the stress values.
Table 4.11 Prediction of elastic coefficient ECL 4.3 Application of Laplace’s law pressure theory on pressure for garments
Table 4.11 Prediction of elastic coefficient ECL 4.3 Application of Laplace’s law pressure theory on pressure for garments
Figure 4.11 The prediction of elastic coefficient of the sample S6 Table 4.10 Fabric deformation of later strain and elastic coefficient
Figure 4.11 The prediction of elastic coefficient of the sample S6 Table 4.10 Fabric deformation of later strain and elastic coefficient
Figure 4.12 The actual mechanical characteristic from stress-strain curves of eight samples of 3™ order polynomial fitting-lines which are given on Table 4.12. standard EN 14704-1. The results were predicted in the strain values by statistical analysis
Figure 4.12 The actual mechanical characteristic from stress-strain curves of eight samples of 3™ order polynomial fitting-lines which are given on Table 4.12. standard EN 14704-1. The results were predicted in the strain values by statistical analysis
Table 4.12 The coefficients of the 3™ order polynomial fitting-lines
Table 4.12 The coefficients of the 3™ order polynomial fitting-lines
Figure 4.13 The stretch fabric effect of pressure and diameter on the strain
Figure 4.13 The stretch fabric effect of pressure and diameter on the strain
Table 4.14 Comparison of S4 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure
Table 4.14 Comparison of S4 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.15 Comparison of S5 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.15 Comparison of S5 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure
Table 4.16 Comparison of S6 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure Vote: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Table 4.16 Comparison of S6 pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure Vote: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.14 Comparison of pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure might be having some negative effects during measuring on the pressure perturbation.
Figure 4.14 Comparison of pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure might be having some negative effects during measuring on the pressure perturbation.
Figure 4.15 Effect of sensor thickness under fabric stretched on rigid cylindrical model model is shown in the Figure 4.15.
Figure 4.15 Effect of sensor thickness under fabric stretched on rigid cylindrical model model is shown in the Figure 4.15.
Vote: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Vote: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Figure 4.16 Effect of sensor thickness between correction factor and Cpp [6] correction factor decreases gradually. In Table 4.17, 4.18, 4.19 and 4.20 represent the results of pressure values obtained from
Figure 4.16 Effect of sensor thickness between correction factor and Cpp [6] correction factor decreases gradually. In Table 4.17, 4.18, 4.19 and 4.20 represent the results of pressure values obtained from
Table 4.19 Comparison of S5 pressure values in three different methods at 0.79 m circumference
Table 4.19 Comparison of S5 pressure values in three different methods at 0.79 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.20 Comparison of S6 pressure values in three different methods at 0.79 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.20 Comparison of S6 pressure values in three different methods at 0.79 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean
methods of calculation which are compared with different strain values of the circumference
methods of calculation which are compared with different strain values of the circumference
Figure 4.17 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.79 m. [6]
Figure 4.17 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.79 m. [6]
Table 4.22 Comparison of S4 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Table 4.22 Comparison of S4 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.23 Comparison of S5 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.23 Comparison of S5 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.24 Comparison of S6 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean Table 4.24 Comparison of S6 pressure values in three different methods at 0.505 m circumference
Figure 4.18 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.505 m. [6]
Figure 4.18 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.505 m. [6]
pressure values measured by PicoPress® in Figure 4.19 (b).
pressure values measured by PicoPress® in Figure 4.19 (b).
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean measured pressure in vitro model were compared with the measured pressure in vivo model level with standing position 30 times. Additionally, predicted pressure and corrected results to the predicted pressure values and corrected measured pressures of the rigid body
Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean measured pressure in vitro model were compared with the measured pressure in vivo model level with standing position 30 times. Additionally, predicted pressure and corrected results to the predicted pressure values and corrected measured pressures of the rigid body
unessentially an influence on the pressure perturbation of sensor thickness durin;
unessentially an influence on the pressure perturbation of sensor thickness durin;
Table 4.27 Comparison of S4 strain values between experimental strain and predicted strain
Table 4.27 Comparison of S4 strain values between experimental strain and predicted strain
Table 4.28 Comparison of S5 strain values between experimental strain and predicted strain
Table 4.28 Comparison of S5 strain values between experimental strain and predicted strain
Figure 4.21 The correlation of predicted strain VS experimental strain of sample S3, $4, SS and S6 can be used for making estimating the strain for CG accurately.
Figure 4.21 The correlation of predicted strain VS experimental strain of sample S3, $4, SS and S6 can be used for making estimating the strain for CG accurately.
Table 4.30 The correlation of predicted strain VS experimental strain of sample S3, S4, S5 and S6 4.4 Performance of novel tensile measurement device 4.4.1 Measurement of fabric properties by novel tensile measurement device
Table 4.30 The correlation of predicted strain VS experimental strain of sample S3, S4, S5 and S6 4.4 Performance of novel tensile measurement device 4.4.1 Measurement of fabric properties by novel tensile measurement device
Table 4.31 The fabric extension values of sample S6 with different weights and cycle loading from the length of fabric extended from five times cycle loading.
Table 4.31 The fabric extension values of sample S6 with different weights and cycle loading from the length of fabric extended from five times cycle loading.
Table 4.32 The correlation of the strain prediction of the sample S6 with different testing devices testing at 0.9994 and standard test at 0.9886 as illustrated in Table 4.32.
Table 4.32 The correlation of the strain prediction of the sample S6 with different testing devices testing at 0.9994 and standard test at 0.9886 as illustrated in Table 4.32.
Figure 4.22 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S6 between manual test and standard test
Figure 4.22 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S6 between manual test and standard test
Table 4.33 The fabric extension values of sample S7 with different weight and cycle loading Figure 4.23 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S7 between manual test and standard test
Table 4.33 The fabric extension values of sample S7 with different weight and cycle loading Figure 4.23 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S7 between manual test and standard test
Table 4.35 The results of fabric deformation in strain, width and elastic coefficient
Table 4.35 The results of fabric deformation in strain, width and elastic coefficient
Figure 4.24 The fabric deformation of the sample S7
Figure 4.24 The fabric deformation of the sample S7
Figure 4.25 The prediction of the elastic coefficient (ECL) of sample S6, S7 and S8 coefficient of determination at 0.9998, 0.9993 and 0.9999 respectively in Table 4.36.
Figure 4.25 The prediction of the elastic coefficient (ECL) of sample S6, S7 and S8 coefficient of determination at 0.9998, 0.9993 and 0.9999 respectively in Table 4.36.
4.5 Defining patternmaking development procedure for stretch fabrics
4.5 Defining patternmaking development procedure for stretch fabrics
creation of patternmaking as shown in Figure 4.26 (a).
creation of patternmaking as shown in Figure 4.26 (a).
*h is thickness unit mm, € is strain and o is stress unit is Pa. order to predict strain values ranging in different parts of the body. Table 4.38 The results of predicted strain values with different parts of female body at 1.15 kPa pressure. value, diameter and thickness of each fabric into the modelling of polynomial equations i
*h is thickness unit mm, € is strain and o is stress unit is Pa. order to predict strain values ranging in different parts of the body. Table 4.38 The results of predicted strain values with different parts of female body at 1.15 kPa pressure. value, diameter and thickness of each fabric into the modelling of polynomial equations i
Table 4.39 The results of predicted strain values with different parts of the female body at pressure 2.4 kPa compression garment and the strain results are obtained in Table 4.39.
Table 4.39 The results of predicted strain values with different parts of the female body at pressure 2.4 kPa compression garment and the strain results are obtained in Table 4.39.
Table 4.40 The size of patternmaking with different parts of the body under the pressure at 2.4 kPa *C is the body circumference and Co is initial circumference of fabric.
Table 4.40 The size of patternmaking with different parts of the body under the pressure at 2.4 kPa *C is the body circumference and Co is initial circumference of fabric.
Table 4.41 The elastic coefficient for 2.4 kPa pressure in width and length dimensions in different body parts 4.5.3 Patternmaking development method for stretch fabrics
Table 4.41 The elastic coefficient for 2.4 kPa pressure in width and length dimensions in different body parts 4.5.3 Patternmaking development method for stretch fabrics
Note: Lv (k) is a vertical line and Lh is a horizontal line and L1 is a central line Table 4.42 Fundamental of block patternmaking formulas
Note: Lv (k) is a vertical line and Lh is a horizontal line and L1 is a central line Table 4.42 Fundamental of block patternmaking formulas
Figure 4.27 The block patternmaking chart
Figure 4.27 The block patternmaking chart
Figure 4.28 The reduction of patternmaking method based on fabric tensile property of sample S7 the cylindrical shape at the shadow area.
Figure 4.28 The reduction of patternmaking method based on fabric tensile property of sample S7 the cylindrical shape at the shadow area.
coefficient of ECW and ECL from the formulas were discovered.
coefficient of ECW and ECL from the formulas were discovered.
(b) Patternmaking for CG at the pressure 2.4 kPa of the sample S7
(b) Patternmaking for CG at the pressure 2.4 kPa of the sample S7
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved