Figure 17 – uploaded by Nareerut Jariyapunya

Figure 2.2 The basic block patternmaking for compression garment  in vertical and horizontal plains.

cutting and sewing  Figure 2.3 Fabric grain lines where the pattern was used the direction for cutting  provides the appropriate or specific pressure [27].

Surface tension T pulls at this rectangle from all four directions, while the curve of the  contribute analogously to the normal force as shown in the Figure 2.4 (b).

Figure 2.5 The cylindrical vessels free-body diagram of the thin-walled pressure vessels [78]

Figure 2.6 The PicoPress® devise of the interface pressure measurement system  used to measure the interface pressure under compression of clothing pressure.

Figure 2.7 Schematic representation of the interface perturbation effect of a sensor placed beneath an extensible bandage over a curved surface [83, 22]

Figure 2.8 Typical stress-strain diagram indicating the various stages of deformation [98].  has the influence on the material deformation.

Figure 2.11 Typical cycling graph [100]  maximum at 50% [8, 10, 105, 106].

Figure 2.12 Graph of force and elongation in hysteresis loops [106]  elongation in hysteresis loops in the loading and unloading cycle [106, 107] is shown

Figure 2.13 Stress response to the stress relaxation test [108]  2.6.12 Dynamic work recovery

iscoelastic deformation, which will produce hysteresis loop as shown in the Figure 2.14.

Figure 3.1 A schematic flowchart of the procedure patternmaking development for stretch fabrics

Figure 3.2 The women body measurement chart

Figure 3.3 The 3D images with point marks using sense™2 3D scanner

3.3.2 Analysis of patternmaking for pressure garments

Figure 3.5 Conventional block pattern relationship to the body measurement

Figure 3.7 The deformation changed of stretch fabric of circumferential and lateral strain

Figure 3.8 Schematic diagram of patternmakins development relate to a circle shape [110]

Figure 3.10 Schematic diagram the tensile testing machine

Figure 3.11 The setting method for testing stress relaxation  determining method of stress relaxation.

Dynamic work recovery of elastic fabric different cycle  cycle to calculate the DWR% and comparison.

Figure 3.13 Experimental for setup for image analysis  camera of 50 cm as shown the Figure 3.13 [113].

Figure 3.15 Image processing steps [113]  3.5 Applying the Laplace’s law for CG and evaluating the pressure  converting a gray-scale input image to a binary image. The purpose of thresholding is to

Figure 3.16 Fabric stretch showing the force directions on the cylindrical model  plane. In the one-direction force acts with two nearly opposite forces of magnitude is F, each

cylindrical model as shown in the Figure 3.18.  The pressure value on the sensor can be applied from the equation (3.26) and used the tension

Figure 3.20 The Schematic design of the tensile measurement device  measurement device are shown as follows:

Figure 3.21 The experimental design and testing of manual tensile testing device  is measured until the fabric elongation reaches 50% on each cycle from 1 to 5 cycle times.

Figure 3.22 The experimental design for capturing the images from manual tensile testing device  Elements - Imaging Software.

locknit structure does have the highest force value in wale and course directions.

Figure 4.1 Graphs of force-elongation characteristics in different direction:  (b) Graph force-elongation in course direction

The graphs in Figure 4.2 (a, b and c) illustrates the stress-strain curves in wale, course and

Figure 4.2 Graphs Stress-strain different directions of 8 samples

Figure 4.4 Graphs comparative the influence of elastane composition on force decay and elastic recovery  Note: “+”is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean

Figure 4.5 Comparative the stress relaxation over the time  wearing on the body.  should be considered in order to help the fabric keep constant the pressure value durir

Figure 4.6 Graphs of Dynamic Work Recovery at the fifth cycle of eight samples  the energy loss in fabric.

Figure 4.7 (1-d) shows the simulated images without extension, 30 % extension in  tensor deformation values also change in similar percentage with respect to the applied

Figure 4.8 Gradient deformation tensor for course direction by tensile testing machine

Figure 4.9 Deformation behaviour of stretch fabric of the sample S6  Note: “+” is the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the mean

Figure 4.10 The comparative the stress values between TS and ES  analysis was successful and evident enough to prove the stress values.

Figure 4.11 The prediction of elastic coefficient of the sample S6  Table 4.10 Fabric deformation of later strain and elastic coefficient

Figure 4.13 The stretch fabric effect of pressure and diameter on the strain

Figure 4.14 Comparison of pressure values between predicted pressure and measured pressure  might be having some negative effects during measuring on the pressure perturbation.

Figure 4.15 Effect of sensor thickness under fabric stretched on rigid cylindrical model  model is shown in the Figure 4.15.

methods of calculation which are compared with different strain values of the circumference

Figure 4.17 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.79 m. [6]

Figure 4.18 Comparison of the pressure values methods with the circumference at 0.505 m. [6]

pressure values measured by PicoPress® in Figure 4.19 (b).

unessentially an influence on the pressure perturbation of sensor thickness durin;

Figure 4.21 The correlation of predicted strain VS experimental strain of sample S3, $4, SS and S6  can be used for making estimating the strain for CG accurately.

Figure 4.22 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S6 between manual test and standard test

Table 4.33 The fabric extension values of sample S7 with different weight and cycle loading   Figure 4.23 Comparison of fabric property results of sample S7 between manual test and standard test

Figure 4.24 The fabric deformation of the sample S7

Figure 4.25 The prediction of the elastic coefficient (ECL) of sample S6, S7 and S8  coefficient of determination at 0.9998, 0.9993 and 0.9999 respectively in Table 4.36.

creation of patternmaking as shown in Figure 4.26 (a).

Figure 4.27 The block patternmaking chart

Figure 4.28 The reduction of patternmaking method based on fabric tensile property of sample S7  the cylindrical shape at the shadow area.