Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 6 – uploaded by Tanfer Caner

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Fig. 6. Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for quartz, orthoclase, pyroxene, gypsum

Figure 6 Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for quartz, orthoclase, pyroxene, gypsum

Related Figures (12)

Fig. 1. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for brass bakalite and perspex. The total cross-section (a) in turn can be related as the sum of partial cross-sections where A; is the atomic weight of the ith element and nj; is the num- ber of formula units.
Fig. 1. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for brass bakalite and perspex. The total cross-section (a) in turn can be related as the sum of partial cross-sections where A; is the atomic weight of the ith element and nj; is the num- ber of formula units.
Fig. 3. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for CdTe. Fig. 2. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for CdSe.
Fig. 3. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for CdTe. Fig. 2. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for CdSe.
* Sidhu et al. (2012). Experimental and theoretical values of effective atomic numbers and electror numbers per unit mass of some low Z compounds at 60 keV. Table 1
* Sidhu et al. (2012). Experimental and theoretical values of effective atomic numbers and electror numbers per unit mass of some low Z compounds at 60 keV. Table 1
Fig. 5. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for quartz, orthoclase, pyroxene, gypsum.
Fig. 5. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for quartz, orthoclase, pyroxene, gypsum.
Fig. 4. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers versus photon energy for 738 superalloy
Fig. 4. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers versus photon energy for 738 superalloy
Fig. 7. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for glycine, alanine, serine, valine, leucine, lysine, arginine, tryptophan
Fig. 7. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for glycine, alanine, serine, valine, leucine, lysine, arginine, tryptophan
Fig. 8. Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for glycine, alanine, serine, valine, leucine, lysine, arginine, tryptophan.
Fig. 8. Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for glycine, alanine, serine, valine, leucine, lysine, arginine, tryptophan.
Fig. 9. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for arabinose, glucose, rhamnose, maltose, melezitose, fructose
Fig. 9. Variation of effective atomic numbers versus photon energy for arabinose, glucose, rhamnose, maltose, melezitose, fructose
Fig. 10. Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for arabinose, glucose, rhamnose, maltose, melezitose, fructose
Fig. 10. Variation of effective electron numbers versus photon energy for arabinose, glucose, rhamnose, maltose, melezitose, fructose
Fig. 11. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers of tyrosine versus photon energy for total and partial photon interactions.
Fig. 11. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers of tyrosine versus photon energy for total and partial photon interactions.
Fig. 12. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers of ribose versus photon energy for total and partial photon interaction: help the scientists in the fields of industry, agriculture, medicine and so on. The effective atomic number and effective electron number per unit mass for some amino acids which are building blocks of pro- tein and for some sugars which play an important role in RNA and DNA in all living cells are determined by using the Direct-Zog. It can be seen in Figs. 7 and 9 that the Ze values of the Direct-Zerg show the same behaviors with the Ze values taken from the Auto-Zog and a previous experimental work in the medium energy range for amino acids such as Glycine, Alanine, Serine, Valine, Leucine, Lysine, Arginine and Tryptophan and sugars such as Arabinose, Glucose, Rhamnose, Maltose, Melezitose and Fructose, respec- tively. Compatibilities of the Neg values from the Direct-Zg with the Neg values of the experimental study are lightly seen for the amino acids and sugars in Figs. 8 and 10, respectively.
Fig. 12. Variation of effective atomic numbers and effective electron numbers of ribose versus photon energy for total and partial photon interaction: help the scientists in the fields of industry, agriculture, medicine and so on. The effective atomic number and effective electron number per unit mass for some amino acids which are building blocks of pro- tein and for some sugars which play an important role in RNA and DNA in all living cells are determined by using the Direct-Zog. It can be seen in Figs. 7 and 9 that the Ze values of the Direct-Zerg show the same behaviors with the Ze values taken from the Auto-Zog and a previous experimental work in the medium energy range for amino acids such as Glycine, Alanine, Serine, Valine, Leucine, Lysine, Arginine and Tryptophan and sugars such as Arabinose, Glucose, Rhamnose, Maltose, Melezitose and Fructose, respec- tively. Compatibilities of the Neg values from the Direct-Zg with the Neg values of the experimental study are lightly seen for the amino acids and sugars in Figs. 8 and 10, respectively.
Related topics:
PhysicsInterdisciplinary EngineeringEffective Atomic NumberMass attenuation coefficient
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved