Background: Routine follow-up is recommended for safe and effective use of contraception in healthy women. However, it has been observed, that a large proportion of acceptors never return to the clinic for follow-up. Objective: To...
moreBackground: Routine follow-up is recommended for safe and effective use of contraception in healthy women. However, it has been
observed, that a large proportion of acceptors never return to the clinic for follow-up.
Objective: To investigate this problem, this study sought to determine the rate and factors associated with Lost to follow-up (LFU)
among acceptors of modern contraceptives at a family planning clinic in a tertiary hospital.
Methodology: This was a retrospective descriptive study of All women who initiated a modern contraceptive method between 1st
January 2014 and 31st December 2018, that were lost to follow-up. Data were retrieved from the hospital records and case notes of all
the women using a proforma data sheet. Information on maternal age, parity, educational status, contraceptive use intention (spacing
or limiting) and method chosen were retrieved. Data were entered into Excel sheet and analyzed with SPSS version 20. Chi-square
test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables were used for bivariate analysis and multiple logistic regression was applied to
test for significant association with P-values of < 0.05 taken as significant.
Results: There were 168 LFU acceptors (of 517 total acceptors) during the five-year study period giving a LFU rate of 32.5%. The
Mean age of the LFU acceptors ± SD was 34.36 ± 5.28 years and median parity was Para 3. Majority 103 (61.3%) accepted Implants
followed by the IUDs in 64 (38.1%). Majority 105 (62.5%) initiated contraception for completed family size. Significantly more LFU
acceptors were using contraception for completed family size than for child spacing compared to those who continued follow-up.
There was significant association between LFU acceptors with age (P = 0.001) and education (P = 0.047), but not with parity (P =
0.259). However, following logistic regression analysis, only age remained statistically significant (P = 0.002). Women > 30 years of
age were almost twice as likely to be LFU than those below ≤ 30 years.
Conclusion: The LFU rate of 32.5% in this study is unacceptably high. Older women over 30 years using contraception for completed
family size were more likely to be lost to follow-up. There is need to identify means of reducing LFU. Recording contact details such as
e-mail and cell phone numbers can assist in follow-up with women who do not keep appointments. Improved participant retention
will improve validity of programs and allows for important clinical outcomes, such as pregnancy, to be assessed.