Key research themes
1. How accurately can established quantitative models and social media sentiment predict the outcomes of the 2016 U.S. presidential nominations and general election?
This research theme investigates the efficacy of forecasting methods—including traditional statistical models using preprimary indicators and early campaign performance, as well as newer computational techniques such as sentiment analysis of Twitter data—to predict the nomination winners and general election outcomes in 2016. It examines what traditional factors retain predictive power in an altered media and political landscape, and how social media-derived sentiment may augment or challenge conventional poll-based forecasting.
2. What patterns emerge from granular precinct-level election data for the 2016 U.S. presidential election, and how can these data enhance political science research?
This research theme focuses on the collection, standardization, and utilization of nearly complete precinct-level election results from the 2016 general election to facilitate fine-grained empirical political analysis. It addresses challenges inherent in assembling consistent granular data across decentralized election administration, and the potential uses of such high-resolution data for studying geographic patterns of voting, political behavior, gerrymandering, and socio-political phenomena at small scales.
3. How did cultural and political expressions of resistance manifest following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, particularly through the lens of magic and witchcraft as political practices?
This theme explores the emergence and role of magic and witchcraft in progressive political resistance after the 2016 election, representing a novel intersection of cultural anthropology, political activism, and religious studies. It investigates how these practices acted as symbolic arts of resistance during a crisis of agency experienced by some left-leaning Americans, how they generated communities of support, and how internal fissures arose within these movements due to differing ethics and aesthetics of magical practice.