Research has the greatest potential to impact change in practice and policy when (1) it is conducted in collaboration with practitioners rather than conducted by an academic researcher alone, and (2) its findings are meaningfully...
moreResearch has the greatest potential to impact change in practice and policy when (1) it is conducted in collaboration with practitioners rather than conducted by an academic researcher alone, and (2) its findings are meaningfully communicated to the people who influence policy and practice . Practitioners in the criminal justice (CJ) system have the potential to play a fundamental role in the development and conduct of research. As administrators, supervisors, and direct service staff, practitioners have knowledge and experience that is critical to conducting the most rigorous research possible and producing useful results and products. This brief provides recommendations to practitioners for collaborating, based on a study conducted with practitioners in the CJ system (staff employed within the CJ system or staff who provide services to CJ-involved clients but are not employed within the system) and researchers in the United States and Canada who, from their perspectives, collaborated successfully to complete a research project. The aims of this brief are to help practitioners (a) plan for future research collaborations that will function as seamlessly as possible and (b) produce findings that have significant impact on practices, policies, services, and ultimately contribute to improving advocacy and support for Goal: To improve understanding of successful researcher-prac oner collabora ons 1 between those working within and outside of the CJ system so that the knowledge learned can be used to promote the crea on of new partnerships and enhance exis ng ones. Design: There were two components to this study. 1. Individual interviews and focus groups were conducted with prac oners and researchers who self-iden fied as having at least one past or current "successful" research partnership (though many also had past unsuccessful partnerships). The purpose was to learn from them what they thought made their partnerships successful. Prac oners, as defined by the Na onal Ins tute of Jus ce for the purpose of this study, were CJ system employees (including administrators of CJ state administra ve agencies, SAAs) and those who provide services to CJ system clients. Researchers were those who conducted research but were not CJ system employees. Par cipants were 55 women and 17 men of various racial/ethnic groups. They were employed in a range of se ngs located in urban, suburban, and rural se ngs in the United States and Canada, including family violence and sexual assault programs, private prac ce, and SAAs such as departments of correc ons, local county courts, independent research ins tutes, and colleges/universi es. They had 4 to 40 years of experience (average of 12 years). 49 people (38 women and 11 men) par cipated in individual interviews (8 of which were with SAA staff) face to face or via telephone. 23 people (17 women and 6 men) par cipated in 5 focus groups convened at professional or academic conferences. Data analysis. The audio/video recorded interviews and focus groups were transcribed verba m. With the aid of a qualita ve analysis so ware package the transcribed files were coded with iden fica on tags corresponding to the RPPS research ques ons related to the following categories determined a priori: highlights of the collabora on, lowlights of the collabora ons, reasons the collabora on was needed, benefits of the collabora on, characteris cs desired in a collaborator, characteris cs desired in an organiza on, characteris cs of a successful collabora on, facilitators of a successful collabora on, barriers/challenges to a successful collabora on, balancing the needs of researchers and prac oners, products and results of the collabora on, usefulness of resul ng products, sustainability of partnerships, advice for researchers, and advice for prac oners. The research team reviewed the coded responses to iden fy salient pa erns or themes. A Web-based survey of CJ-system SAAs aimed to (a) determine each state's infrastructure and general experiences regarding research in the CJ system and (b) document lessons learned from past or current successful collabora ons with a researcher not employed within the CJ system. Par cipants were those whose responsibility it was either to oversee the conduct of research in the SAA or to conduct research on behalf of the state. Seventy-five par cipants from 49 states completed the survey, with several states having mul ple respondents from different SAA research departments (i.e., department of correc ons, office of the courts, etc.). Of respondents, 41% were administrators or directors of the agency, 35% were supervisors or managers, 21% were front-line or support staff, and 3% were university-employed Sta s cal Analysis Center (SAC) directors 2 . Data analysis. Data were analyzed to present simple descrip ve sta s cs such as an average or the percentage of par cipants who endorsed a response.