The Earth's upper and lower mantle have quite distinct physical properties, with the characteristics of material exchange between them being a long-debated issue. Progress in global seismic tomography in the 1990s 1,2 showed that the...
moreThe Earth's upper and lower mantle have quite distinct physical properties, with the characteristics of material exchange between them being a long-debated issue. Progress in global seismic tomography in the 1990s 1,2 showed that the upper and lower mantle interact mainly via subducting slabs and mantle plumes, albeit subject to the presence of strong resistance along the upper-lower mantle boundary at ~660 km depth. More recently, enhanced tomography images showed that among the slabs that penetrate into the lower mantle, many of them stagnate down to about ~1,000 km depth 3. Conversely, mantle plumes rising from the deep lower mantle seem to deflect laterally when they reach this region 4. However, the uppermost lower mantle, located at depths of ~660-1,000 km, remains an enigmatic part of the Earth. It has been suggested that compositional layering 5,6 or a viscosity increase 7,8 may cause flow stagnation in this region, but its rheology and role in mantle convection are poorly understood. The stagnation of subducting slabs at ~660 km depth and their penetration into the lower mantle lead to intense strain and deformation around the slabs, which in turn can align mineral aggregates. As the most abundant lower-mantle mineral (bridgmanite) is anisotro-pic, observable seismic anisotropy should develop when considering a dislocation creep deformation mechanism 9-11. However, apart from the D" region in the lowermost mantle 12 , the presence of seismic anisotropy in the lower mantle is uncertain and debated 13-15 , with most previous seismological models suggesting that the bulk of the uppermost lower mantle is radially isotropic in shear wavespeed 16. To resolve this paradox, it has been proposed that the dominant deformation mechanisms in the lower mantle, such as superplastic flow 17 or a pure climb creep mechanism 18 , may not produce anisotropy. Observations of anisotropy in the uppermost lower mantle Some recent regional shear-wave splitting studies suggest the presence of anisotropy in the transition zone and uppermost lower mantle near some subduction zones 19-21. However, the limited depth resolution and azimuthal coverage in regional studies, together with the difficulty in isolating lower-mantle anisotropy from upper-mantle effects, can restrict the interpretation of these studies. While illuminating mostly large-scale features, global anisotropy tomography overcomes these issues by mapping the whole mantle, which is key to interpreting large-scale processes and global mantle flow in a unified way 22,23. Nevertheless, several issues such as the use of different data and modelling approaches, notably when handling crustal effects 24-26 , led to poor agreement between past global mantle anisotropy models. SGLOBE-rani is a recent whole-mantle shear-wave radially anisotropic model that is based on a large seismic dataset of over 43 million seismic measurements with complementary sensitivity to the entire Earth's mantle. It simultaneously models crustal thickness and mantle structure to reduce artefacts in the retrieved anisotropic structure 27,28. The use of a huge set of over 10 million surface-wave overtone measurements, which have sensitivity down to ~1,000 km depth (Supplementary Fig. 1), enables good data coverage in the transition zone (Supplementary Figs. 2-4). Below that, a large set of body-wave travel-time measurements assures good data coverage in the remainder of the lower mantle (Supplementary Fig. 3). However, the poor balance between SV-and SH-sensitive travel-time data in existing body-wave datasets leads to poorly resolved lowermost-mantle anisotropy and leakage effects 28 , in agreement with the findings from other previous whole-mantle anisotropy studies 29,30. Thus, we take the conservative approach of not interpreting any anisotropic structures below ~1,400 km depth. Chang et al. 28 compared SGLOBE-rani with other recent global anisotropy models and, as expected, found better correlations between the iso-tropic part of the models than between the anisotropic structure. Yet, a correlation of about 0.5 was found between the anisotropic structure in SGLOBE-rani and in the recent model Savani 31 , which Seismic anisotropy provides key information to map the trajectories of mantle flow and understand the evolution of our planet. While the presence of anisotropy in the uppermost mantle is well established, the existence and nature of anisotropy in the transition zone and uppermost lower mantle are still debated. Here we use three-dimensional global seismic tomography images based on a large dataset that is sensitive to this region to show the ubiquitous presence of anisotropy in the lower mantle beneath subduction zones. Whereas above the 660 km seismic discontinuity slabs are associated with fast SV anomalies up to about 3%, in the lower mantle fast SH anomalies of about 2% persist near slabs down to about 1,000-1,200 km. These observations are consistent with 3D numerical models of deformation from subducting slabs and the associated lattice-preferred orientation of bridgmanite produced in the dislocation creep regime in areas subjected to high stresses. This study provides evidence that dislocation creep may be active in the Earth's lower mantle, providing new constraints on the debated nature of deformation in this key, but inaccessible, component of the deep Earth.