580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
Key research themes
1. How can bacteriophages be effectively employed for biocontrol of Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae pathogens?
This research area focuses on the isolation, genomic characterization, host range, receptor specificity, and applied efficacy of lytic bacteriophages targeting Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae (SRP) such as Pectobacterium and Dickeya species. It matters due to the need for alternative, sustainable disease management strategies in agriculture to combat bacterial soft rot diseases that cause significant crop losses and have limited chemical control options. Understanding phage biology, host interaction, and formulation of phage cocktails is critical to mitigate bacterial resistance and improve host coverage.
Key finding: This comprehensive review synthesizes genomic and ecological data on bacteriophages infecting Pectobacterium and Dickeya spp., highlighting taxonomic diversity driven by whole-genome sequencing advances. It establishes that... Read more
Key finding: Through isolation and characterization of three lytic phages showing distinct morphologies (podovirus-like and myovirus-like) and differing multiplicities of infection (MOI), this study demonstrates their in vitro lytic... Read more
2. What is the extent of genetic and species diversity within soft rot-causing Pectobacterium pathogens and how does this impact disease management?
This research theme investigates species delineation, phylogenetics, and genotypic diversity within Pectobacterium strains isolated from different hosts (e.g., cabbage, potato, Calla lily), using multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), genome-wide relatedness indices (ANI, dDDH), rep-PCR, and whole genome sequencing. Understanding such diversity is crucial for accurate pathogen identification, epidemiology, and tailoring targeted management approaches, as closely related but distinct species may differ in host range, virulence, and resistance profiles.
Key finding: This work characterized 67 isolates from symptomatic cabbage by phenotypic assays, rep-PCR, pathogenicity tests, and MLSA of multiple housekeeping genes (dnaX, proA, mdh), revealing inter- and intra-species diversity... Read more
Key finding: Through combination of MLSA from nine housekeeping genes, fatty acid profiling, whole-genome phylogenomics, and MALDI-TOF MS, this study defines a novel Pectobacterium species—P. zantedeschiae—distinct from closely related... Read more
Key finding: Using PCR-RFLP of 16S-23S ITS regions, malate dehydrogenase gene sequencing, MLSA of atpD, gyrB, infB, rpoB, and rep-PCR fingerprinting, this study identified Lebanese potato soft rot isolates as P. aroidearum and P.... Read more
3. Which bacterial factors and host chemical signals regulate virulence expression in soft rot Pectobacterium, and how might these insights enable novel intervention strategies?
This theme encompasses studies exploring molecular regulatory networks controlling soft rot pathogen virulence, focusing on extracellular plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (PCWDE) production and induction by host-derived chemical signals. It underscores complex interactions between bacterial regulators (e.g., quorum sensing systems, KdgR repressor), host pectic compounds, and non-pectin plant metabolites. These insights are fundamental to understanding pathogen activation in planta and could guide development of targeted inhibitors or resistance breeding.
Key finding: This study elucidates two classes of host-derived inducers triggering PCWDE production: Class I (pectin degradation intermediates like KDG) acting via derepression by KdgR; and Class II (thermostable, non-pectin compounds... Read more
4. Can broad-spectrum antagonistic bacteria within the Paenibacillus polymyxa complex serve as effective biocontrol agents against soft rot caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species?
Research in this area evaluates the antagonistic potential of Paenibacillus polymyxa complex strains, known producers of polymyxins and fusaricidins, against soft rot phytopathogens. Efforts focus on assessing whether these strains can inhibit polymyxin-resistant Pectobacterium and Dickeya species, exploring antagonistic spectra, molecular basis of inhibition, and application efficacy. This is significant due to the scarcity of effective chemical controls and the need for integrated biological management tools.
Key finding: Contrary to expectations that polymyxin resistance in Dickeya and Pectobacterium would negate antagonism, all tested P. polymyxa complex strains showed strong inhibitory activity against a polymyxin-resistant Dickeya dadantii... Read more