The article “Beyond Unhappy Consciousness: Plotinus and Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit” by Sui Han begins by discussing the historical and conceptual links between Plotinus and Hegel. She references Jens Halfwassen's work, which provides...
moreThe article “Beyond Unhappy Consciousness: Plotinus and Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit” by Sui Han begins by discussing the historical and conceptual links between Plotinus and Hegel. She references Jens Halfwassen's work, which provides documentary evidence of the Neoplatonic origins of Hegel's thought, particularly in the development of his dialectical method and the concept of the Absolute. This paper argues that the moment corresponding to Neoplatonism in the Phenomenology of Spirit is located in the transition from “unhappy consciousness” to “reason.” Neoplatonism provided Hegel with a historical template for transcending unhappy consciousness, characterized by the transcendence of separation of singular from the universal and the eventual complete interpenetration of singular with the universal. By comparing Plotinus’ proposal for dealing with the unhappiness of his time with Hegel’s plan for overcoming the unhappy consciousness of the new era, this paper highlights the connections and differences between the two and, based on this, evaluates Hegel’s modern proposal.
This paper points out that the unhappy consciousness that permeated Plotinus’ time originated from the singularisation of the self by the body, which led to separation from the universality of the intelligible world. Transcending unhappiness means transcending the singular self as a physical body and ascending to the intelligible world, in which the one is all. The singularity and finitude that cause unhappiness are thereby transcended. However, individuality is not directly negated but is instead preserved within the ultimate whole. Plotinus’ solution was a vertical transcendence in the direction of removing the world, historical time, and achieving inaction and silence.
In the new period, under the name of unhappy consciousness, Hegel thought of various forms of individualism. The unhappiness still stemmed from the separation of the singular and the universal. However, the concepts of singular, universal, and separation all acquired new meanings: the singular was the acting individual, and the universal was the human community. Hegel’s solution to unhappy consciousness was his dialectics. This text analyzes how different levels of unhappy consciousness in the Phenomenology of Spirit are respectively transcended. In the abstract self-consciousness stage, the unhappy consciousness represents the extreme development of self-consciousness. It is a form of consciousness that is aware of its own internal duality. One pole of its contradiction is aware that the universal God is the essence, while the other pole is aware that its own singular being-for self is non-essential. To transcend this unhappy consciousness, simply and directly negating singular being is not feasible. Hegel employs his dialectical method to demonstrate how the unhappy consciousness can sublate itself through mediation. First, the infinite separation of the singular self-consciousness from God is manifested as the former's striving to ascend to the latter, yet inevitably failing to reach it. In the second step, God appears in the world in the form of Christ, becoming the concrete universal. With Christ's passing away, the Holy Spirit lives on in the Christian community. Since the Church has a direct relationship with God, it can advise singular consciousness on what is correct. The singular consciousness follows the Church's decisions, alienates its inner and outer freedom, and finally, through participating in the Church's rituals, establishes itself as the universal will within the Church community. This article particularly emphasizes that although the unhappy consciousness is ultimately sublated in the universal self, this is not just any community, but the sacred community after the incarnation of God. Otherwise, it would not have the legitimacy to make decisions on behalf of the singular self-consciousness.
In the stage of modern individualism, this paper analyzes the three forms of consciousness of Faustianism, sentimentalism, and the cavalier of virtue, pointing out that the dialectical evolution is characterized by the relationship between the singular and the universal becoming increasingly close. The individual sublates the division between meaning for self and reality in itself through actions in the world. The achievement of the individual's actions is contingent, while the action itself is necessary. After sublating this opposition, one ascends to the thing-in-itself (die Sache selbst). The thing-in-itself ultimately develops into the objective spirit (Geist), which is the achievement of the actions of everyone and each individual, where I am we, and we are I. This article lists the correspondence between the text of the Enneads and the paragraphs of the Phenomenology of Spirit to show how Hegel's concepts of die Sache selbst and Geist are related to the teaching of idea and the concept of νοῦς in Platonism, and particularly emphasizes that the template role of Platonism for Hegel lies in its conception of the unity of the singular and the universal, in which individuality is not sacrificed.
Hegel’s dialectics was a modern interpretation of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Although the Christian doctrine had a corresponding structure ὄν-ζωή-νοῦς in Neoplatonism, the latter did not use it to address the unhappy consciousness of its time. No matter how similar Neoplatonism and Hegel may appear on the surface, Hegel’s modernity lies in his introduction of action, history, and intersubjectivity into the scheme for overcoming unhappy consciousness. Whether his plan is successful is a question worth reflecting on through comparison with Plotinus’ proposal.