In 1946 I. Venedikov published a short report on the discovery of a female Roman statue, found in the vineyard of a person from Byala cherkva, but situated in the land of Pavlikeni. A piece of a lower part of another female statue was...
moreIn 1946 I. Venedikov published a short report on the discovery of a female Roman statue, found in the vineyard of a person from Byala cherkva, but situated in the land of Pavlikeni. A piece of a lower part of another female statue was found, as well as a limestone sarcophagus and the remains of a building. The latter is interpreted by the same author as a mausoleum. The whole of the two statues was entered in the Antiquity fund of the National Archaeological Museum in 1945 (inv. No 7095) (Fig. 24, Fig. 25).
Although the statue has been a subject of several later publications, its exact findspot and context has remained obscure. Partial exception is a note of B. Sultov who mentioned, in one of his publications from 1977, that the statue was found near the cardboard factory of Pavlikeni. All the available information has provoked the author of the present publication to try to find where the statue was found and what its context is.
Some isolines of a large scale topographic map of the area, called Eski baala (“Old vineyard” from Turkish), resemble a mound elevation (Fig. 29). This data, in combination with shared by Dr. I. Tsarov information on discovered in the early 90es of the 20th c. Roman walls south of the “Haemus” Highway Bypass, were taken as starting point of the search. It occurred that it was successful. The area is a crop field and a recently uprooted poplar wood (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). A cut off by the road burial mound and its respective settlement structure was registered, later intensively surveyed by the author (Ill. 1, Ill. 2, Ill. 3, Ill. 4, Ill. 5).
The settlement covers an area of c. 6 ha. Three hectares more cover an area with important finds (Fig. 26, Fig. 27, Fig. 28, Fig. 29). The surface ceramic scatters indicate that its preliminary date is from the third quarter of the 2nd c. up to the middle of the 3rd c. (Fig. 5 – Fig. 17). Some ceramic shards form coarse wares have typological characteristics of vessels from the middle of the 5th c. (Fig. 14.1, Fig. 14.2, Fig. 15.1, Fig. 16.1). It is not sure whether the site existed in that time.
Small finds, as a fragment from a quern stone indicate grain production (Fig. 20, Fig. 22, Fig. 31). A whole bronze bowl with a graffito of a probable military servant from the “century of Decius”(Ill. 4, Fig. 19, Ill. 6, Ill. 7, Fig. 23.1), found at the site during the survey, and the previously discovered statues and possible mausoleum indicate the high status of the inhabitants of the site. The site’s precise identification could not be determined at this stage of research. On the one hand its characteristics are suitable for a Roman villa with the cemeteries of its wealthy owners. On the other – it could be a small village next to a bigger (The ancient settlement in the northwestern part of Pavlikeni).
One hundred and forty meters southeast from the settlement is situated a burial mound with Roman date (Fig. 26 – Fig. 29). It has a diameter 70 х 63 m diameter and 1.5 m height (Fig. 32, Fig. 33). On its top, next to the southwest side of the bypass road, the remains of a submound structure are registered (Fig. 32, Fig. 33). They consist of two walls, built of sandstones, mortar and bricks (Fig. 36 – Fig. 42). One of the walls is oriented southwest – northeast and its width is 0.80 m (Fig. 38, Fig. 39). The other is transverse to the first in eastern direction; it has an orientation northwest – southeast and 0.55 m width (Fig. 40, Fig. 41). The two walls could be part of a tomb, but archaeological excavation could tell more about the exact interpretation. The burial mound is most probably part of the cemeteries of the settlement site.
An interesting feature is visible on a 1946 aerial picture of the Eski baala area. It reminds of a rectangular building in the farm fields (Fig. 26). The georeferencing of the picture locates this structure in the southeastern corner of the yard of the cardboard factory in Pavlikeni (Fig. 27 – Fig. 29). It could be supposed that these remains belong to the Roman mausoleum from which the marble statue originates. If the interpretation is correct, it would mean that the settlement site has more than one cemetery – the mausoleum, the burial mound and probably the place with the discovery of the bronze bowl (Ill. 4, Fig. 27 – Fig. 29).
The newly-registered Roman era site is situated in an area with high concentration of villae and vici (Fig. 42). The closest site is the probable village in the northwestern part of the town of Pavlikeni. Most probably both of them were in a dependent existence. The site had also a simultaneous existence with the manufacturing centre and villa at Varbovski livadi area and the large settlement and manufacturing centre in Butovo.