Key research themes
1. How effective are refutation texts in correcting misconceptions and promoting conceptual change?
This research theme investigates the empirical effectiveness of refutation texts in educational settings, focusing on how they facilitate learners’ conceptual change by explicitly addressing misconceptions and providing corrective explanations. It also explores the conditions and formats under which refutation texts maximize knowledge revision and metacognitive awareness about misconceptions.
2. What are the epistemological and philosophical foundations that inform the structure and function of refutation and skeptical arguments?
This theme explores the logical, epistemological, and dialectical principles underlying refutation arguments, skeptical reasoning, and their engagement with knowledge claims. Research in this area examines the formal structure of skeptical arguments—such as closure principles and debunking claims—and investigates how refutation functions in dialectical settings and historical philosophical discourse to understand knowledge justification, disagreement, and conceptual oppositions.
3. How do educational and literary critiques inform the use of refutation texts in culturally and politically sensitive contexts?
This theme addresses pedagogical and critical perspectives on refutation texts, particularly their assumptions about knowledge transmission, learner autonomy, and cultural responsiveness. It analyzes tensions between authoritative refutations and critical literacy or culturally responsive pedagogies, highlighting ethical and practical challenges in employing refutation texts within diverse classrooms and politically charged domains.