Through studying the report of a public enquiry -the Report of the committee of the inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital (DoH 1999a)and a detailed analysis of interpersonal processes in professional...
moreThrough studying the report of a public enquiry -the Report of the committee of the inquiry into the Personality Disorder Unit, Ashworth Special Hospital (DoH 1999a)and a detailed analysis of interpersonal processes in professional consultations with forensic practitioners through the 'lens' of a psycho-analytically-informed paradigm, a critical link is demonstrated between clinical interpersonal processes with patients in perverse, antisocial states of mind and professional performance. The study shows unconscious processes attacking reality and thinking, 'nudging' professionals into acting out of role in ways known to contribute to the emergence of critical incidents. It is grounded in an enquiry that effected changes in legislation, policy, clinical practice and the delivery of social care in secure psychiatric settings. Social work is conducted within a social arena of contemporary concerns about risk and its prediction and management. When things go tragically wrong, events are scrutinised in the form of internal and public formal enquiries with emotive media commentary. Recent examples -Victoria Climbie, Baby Peter -demonstrate the way the public imagination can focus on perceptions of professional failings. The explosion of private events such as these into the public domain results in changes to structures, processes and political understandings in relation to risk, danger and fear. Such enquiries illuminate professional conduct with hindsight, foregrounding decisions that may appear misguided and are popularly held as evidence of incompetence. However, rarely do they ask why apparently 'ordinary decent' professionals appear to have acted in extraordinary ways and usually sensible people sometimes do foolish things. This forensic study suggests that a psychoanalytic paradigm is a useful means of achieving a depth of insight in this context. It proposes widely applicable understandings of the types of personal qualities and management structures necessary to delivering high risk, high profile, anxiety-driven services in a social climate of fear. The paedophile is the bogeyman of our age. The very word itself has become a conduit for fear and public loathing, often beyond all moderation. Indeed, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of paedophiles are male, commentators reach easily for parallels with a reviled figure from a bygone age -the witch. While we haven't yet reinvented the ducking stool or trial by water, we have found a pretty effective 21 st -century equivalent in trial by newspaper. And, after being named and shamed, the "guilty" are hounded from the community by a mob baying for blood. (Silverman & Wilson 2002: 1) Chapter 1: Introduction: "Favouring fright over facts" (Gostin 2002) These crimes are sickening. It is against this backdrop that one must ask why this child was allowed to visit these men, frequently unsupervised, at all, let alone on any ward, but particularly on this ward housing patients with serious personality disorders, all of whom had serious criminal histories, including murder, rape and sexual assaults against children. (DoH 1999a: 3.11.3) …the professional isolation of the Social Work Department vividly demonstrated in the Hospital's approach to child protection, which appeared to reflect almost complete ignorance of the Children Act 1989 and its guiding principles. We shall see an example of the lack of clarity over the social work role when it came to vetting visitors. We shall also see the problems caused by a particular autonomous professional who neglected core social work duties for therapy; whose record-keeping was poor; and whose general approach to his social work duties demonstrated poor standards and reflected poor supervision. (DoH 1999a: 1.32.13) ...Before 1989 no sensible lawyer, doctor, social worker, psychologist, hospital administrator, or responsible member of the public would have thought it appropriate to expose young children to paedophiles, particularly paedophiles with known criminal histories. Before 1989 responsible members of the public would have been horrified by the knowledge that such exposure was allowed on the basis of it being therapeutically advantageous for such criminal paedophiles, who were not even close family members. That this occurred is something for which no one involved in Ashworth Hospital can escape a degree of criticism…. (DoH 1999a: 3.31.16