Key research themes
1. How can prosodic and stress patterns refine the phonological reconstruction of non-primary nominal stems like *-mon in Proto-Indo-European?
This theme focuses on refining the phonological and morphological understanding of internally derived Proto-Indo-European *-mon-stems, moving beyond previous assumptions of amphikinetic inflection and root full-grade stress patterns. It matters because it challenges established paradigms of PIE nominal derivation, root vocalism, and stress accentuation systems, with implications for morphophonological processes and ablaut patterns across daughter languages.
2. What phonetic and phonological evidence from daughter languages and experimental methods inform our understanding of PIE phonological features such as stress, vocalism, and segmental properties?
This research area engages both diachronic data from Indo-European daughter languages and synchronic experimental phonetics tools to analyze acoustic correlates—duration, intensity, formants, pitch—and articulatory features that illuminate PIE phonological phenomena including stress prominence and segmental identity. The integration of instrumental phonetics contributes objective measurements, enhancing reliability over purely comparative methods and native speaker intuition.
3. How do morphophonological processes such as reduplication and voice system development in PIE enhance our knowledge of segmental dissimilation, voicing assimilation, and verbal morphology?
This theme investigates specific morphophonological phenomena in PIE—reduplication patterns, the passive voice, and voicing/length contrasts in stops—through comparative and typological analyses. It matters since these processes affect the reconstruction of the PIE phonological system, revealing regularities and irregularities of segmental and suprasegmental behavior that influence morphological paradigms and their phonological shapes across IE branches.