Key research themes
1. How did settlement patterns and site locations differ between Mesolithic foragers and Early Neolithic farmers in the Carpathian Basin?
This theme investigates the spatial organization and environmental preferences of prehistoric human groups during the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in the Carpathian Basin. It focuses on how Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and Early Neolithic agriculturalists selected their camp and settlement locations differently based on landscape features and resource availability. Understanding these contrasts is vital for accurately predicting site locations, interpreting cultural interactions, and reconstructing shifts in subsistence and mobility strategies across a region critical for European Neolithisation.
2. What do lithic assemblages and raw material usage reveal about cultural continuity and technological adaptations during the Neolithic in the Carpathian Basin?
This theme centers on lithic technology, raw material procurement, and production strategies as proxies to track cultural exchanges, technological innovations, and population interactions across the Neolithic period in the Carpathian Basin. By analyzing changes and consistencies in tool typologies, raw material choices, and production techniques, these studies elucidate the persistence or transformation of traditions amid the spread of farming and increasing social complexity. It further links technological shifts to broader socio-environmental processes shaping prehistoric human lifeways.
3. How do bioarchaeological and isotopic data inform on mobility patterns, population dynamics, and social structures during the Neolithic in the Carpathian Basin?
This theme explores demographic compositions, health status, and individual mobility through multidisciplinary bioarchaeological methods, including physical anthropological analysis, strontium and oxygen isotope studies, and ancient DNA analyses. These approaches elucidate human population movements, social organization, and interactions over the Neolithic period, providing evidence for exogamy patterns, kinship, social differentiation, and adaptation to environmental and cultural changes. The integration of biological data with archaeological context enhances understanding of the biological and social dimensions of Neolithic communities.