This article examines the development of the interest group system in Macedonia since independence and the extent to which it has been able to exert any influence in the political arena. We show how security issues, slow economic...
moreThis article examines the development of the interest group system in Macedonia since independence and the extent to which it has been able to exert any influence in the political arena. We show how security issues, slow economic development, and democratic deficits have impeded the development of an extensive interest group system able to compete freely in national politics. This has resulted in Macedonia having a bifurcated interest group system with influential power elites but low participation by citizens in formal interest groups. Despite this, there have been some diversification of the group system, restructuring of exiting associations, professionalization, and increased ability, especially that of citizens and social movements, to influence national politics. 1 | INTRODUCTION Macedonia gained independence from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) in September 1991. Since then, it has worked to consolidate pluralist democracy. It might be assumed that nurturing the essential elements of a comprehensive, effective, pluralist interest group system has been part of this process of democratic consolidation. Yet today, Macedonia remains an unconsolidated democracy with a number of democratic deficits in what, in effect, is a "party state" operating in a consociational democracy, with ethnic power-sharing arrangement. This has presented challenges to developing an independent interest group system able to operate effectively in the policymaking process. Nevertheless, although the mass of Macedonians do not participate in formal interest groups, there have been advances in the development and activities of formal groups and increasing citizen action that have added new elements to advocacy activity. This article examines the mobilization of interest groups, their activities and development, and their ability to influence public policy in the years since independence. This includes assessing their role in national politics and their contribution to democratization since the demise of the SFRY. Existing work on interest groups in Macedonia is scant. There are previous studies on particular types of groups (Hristova, 2008; Majhošev, 2012), survey results from a study of interest groups in Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia (Cekik, 2015), and articles on the Europeanization of interest groups (Cekik, 2017; Hristova & Cekik, 2015). However, there is no comprehensive treatment of groups and group activity in Macedonia. Given this dearth of information, this article drew on a range of sources. A review of the literature on interest groups provided the basis for understanding the development of the Macedonia system and for comparisons with the experience in other countries. Legal and public sources were used for explaining the legal environment and the number and types of interests and interest groups operating in contemporary Macedonia. Specific sources included a project on civil society groups in the Balkans (Cekik & Hristova, 2015). The details of this study are covered in the first article in this volume (see section 4). To acquire information on contemporary interest group activity and the influence of formal and informal interests, we conducted interviews with several political practitioners. Details of the components of this survey are also provided in the first article to this volume (see section 5.5). A list of those surveyed and their affiliations is provided at the end of this article. The article begins by outlining the fundamental characteristics of Macedonia's contemporary interest group system. The rest of the article considers the factors and developments that have produced these characteristics and how the group system has related to the process of pluralist democratization. 2 | THE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MACEDONIA'S INTEREST GROUP SYSTEM As a political system with a long history of authoritarian rule and a short experience with democracy, Macedonia's interest group system