Phosphine gas, or hydrogen phosphide (PH 3), is the most common insecticide applied to durable stored products worldwide and is routinely used in the United States for treatment of bulk-stored cereal grains and other durable stored...
morePhosphine gas, or hydrogen phosphide (PH 3), is the most common insecticide applied to durable stored products worldwide and is routinely used in the United States for treatment of bulk-stored cereal grains and other durable stored products. Research from the late 1980s revealed low frequencies of resistance to various residual grain protectant insecticides and to phosphine in grain insect species collected in Oklahoma. The present work, which used the same previously established discriminating dose bioassays for phosphine toxicity as in the earlier study, evaluated adults of nine different populations of red ßour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), and Þve populations of lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) collected from different geographic locations in Oklahoma. One additional population for each species was a laboratory susceptible strain. Discriminating dose assays determined eight out of the nine T. castaneum populations, and all Þve populations of R. dominica, contained phosphine-resistant individuals, and highest resistance frequencies were 94 and 98%, respectively. DoseÐresponse bioassays and logit analyses determined that LC 99 values were Ϸ3 ppm for susceptible and 377 ppm for resistant T. castaneum, and Ϸ2 ppm for susceptible and 3,430 ppm for resistant R. dominica. The most resistant T. castaneum population was 119-fold more resistant than the susceptible strain and the most resistant R. dominica population was over 1,500-fold more resistant. Results suggest a substantial increase in phosphine resistance in these major stored-wheat pests in the past 21 yr, and these levels of resistance to phosphine approach those reported for other stored-grain pest species in other countries. KEY WORDS fumigation, stored-product, red ßour beetle, lesser grain borer, phosphine resistance The United States is among the worldÕs leading producers of wheat. Oklahoma is a major producer of winter wheat in the United States and in 2010 was ranked the third largest producer of this type of wheat among U.S. states with production of 3.3 million tonnes (121 million bushels) (National Agricultural Statistics Service [NASS] 2012). Production levels this high are associated with grain pest management practices to protect the enormous wheat investment in storage from losses caused by stored-wheat insect pests. Moreover, Oklahoma is a high-risk state for grain storage because of the longer storage period for grain and the relatively high ambient temperatures (Cuperus et al. 1990, Hagstrum and Flinn 1992). The main method used for controlling insect infestations in stored wheat in Oklahoma is fumigation using phosphine gas, hydrogen phosphide (PH 3), and all wheat stored in Oklahoma is fumigated at least once a year (Cuperus et al. 1986, Flinn et al. 2003). Commercial storage facilities in Oklahoma use fumigation as the primary management tool and on average fumigate 2.6 times per year (Cuperus et al. 1990). In many grain elevators in the United States, phosphine is currently the only economically viable product for stored-wheat insect pest management (Hagstrum et al. 1999). This scenario has resulted in the frequent use of phosphine, especially in the southern Unite States. The common use of phosphine globally is because of government regulation of pesticides that led to the loss of older fumigants (carbon tetrachloride, carbon disulÞde, ethylene dichloride, and ethylene dibromide), the phasing out of methyl bromide, the declining use of residual contact insecticides stemming from harmful residues they leave in food, and the lack of alternative fumigants that are as convenient to use and cost-effective as phosphine (e.g., Collins et al. 2001, Fields and White 2002, Nayak et al. 2003, Phillips and Throne 2010). Attributes that contribute to widespread use of phosphine are that it is relatively inexpensive, easy to apply, leaves minimal residues, and can be used in a wide range of storage types and commodities (Nayak and Collins 2008). These attributes plus the fact that wheat storage in southern United States is risky have made phosphine the Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing speciÞc information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by Oklahoma State University or Kansas State University.