Transition, as one of the most popular sociological and political concepts of today, means nothing but the transition from one state to another one, the desired state, that is, the movement from undemocratic political regimes...
moreTransition, as one of the most popular sociological and political concepts of
today, means nothing but the transition from one state to another one, the desired
state, that is, the movement from undemocratic political regimes (authoritarian,
totalitarian, post totalitarian and sultan) to democratic regimes. During the
transitional period, that is, the transition, new political and overall social relations
are being formed, and they are spreading and becoming the necessary conditions for
the functioning of the new political and, overall, the new social system. Observed
from this aspect, this paper discusses a complex process of the democratic transition
in the societies of South and East Europe. In the first part of the paper, we will
consider political parties, the party system and political regimes in the process of the
democratic transition. We will see what the characteristics of political parties are, the
party systems and the political regimes, that is, authoritarian, totalitarian, post-
totalitarian, sultan and democratic regimes. In the second part we are talking about
the phenomenon of the democratic transition. We focus on: 1) defining a democratic
transition, as an extremely popular sociological and political concept; 2) analysis of
the actors of the democratic transition; 3) sociological and political analysis of
democratization (waves of democratization) and liberalization; 4) sociological and
political analysis of social-political elites in the process of the democratic transition;
5) consideration of the sociological and political aspects of the consolidation of
democracy; and 6) the attempt to give a final answer to what is to be achieved at all
in the democratic transition. In the third part of the paper, we are discussing the
democratic transition in Southern Europe, that is, in Spanish, Portuguese and Greek
society. As we will see, it was a very successful process, which, thanks to its internal
social-political factors, was rapidly completed. It was a direct transition from the
semi-periphery system of the world (authoritarian regime, dictatorship) into the
center of the world system (democracy). In the fourth part of the paper, we focus on the democratic transition in Eastern and Southeastern Europe, that is, in Russian,
Polish, Romanian, Czechoslovak, Hungarian, Bulgarian and Montenegrin society. In
the fifth, the last part of the paper, we will talk about the crisis of democracy on a
global level. We will try to give arguments that support our assumption that liberal
democracy is in a serious crisis today. In the conclusion of this paper, we will
present the results of our research, that is, we will see if our hypotheses have been
confirmed or overturned.
Keywords: authoritarian regime; totalitarian regime; post-totalitarian
regime; sultan; democracy; transition; democratic consolidation; Spain; Portugal;
Greece; Russia; Poland; Romania; Czechoslovakia; Hungary; Bulgaria; Montenegro.
Scientific area: Sociology.
Narrow scientific field: Sociology of politics.