The thalamocortical projection is an integral part of the primary pathway through which information from the outside world reaches the neocortex. Given such a vital task, it is no wonder that the cortical neurons onto which the TC...
moreThe thalamocortical projection is an integral part of the primary pathway through which information from the outside world reaches the neocortex. Given such a vital task, it is no wonder that the cortical neurons onto which the TC projection synapses (L4) have large postsynaptic potentials. Nonetheless, ~85% of synapses onto cortical neurons come not from the thalamus, but from within the cortex. This raises questions about the efficacy of this projection, which the authors deal with in this paper. The researchers initially suggest different possibilities for the causes of PSPs in the barrels of rats S1, when following thalamic input. They pose the plausibility of recurrent excitatory connections within L4, as an amplification circuit to incoming thalamic input. They also suggest that the TC synapses could simply have high-efficacy, thus invalidating the need for extra circuits. Throughout the paper, findings are presented about the amplitude of aPSPs in L4, and the very structure of the thalamocortical projection, in order to discuss these possibilities. In vitro recordings show a stronger TC–L4 synapse than other CT connections, in the order of 4 mV. The authors discredit this value, obtained through means of electrical stimulation of TC fibers. Certain dynamics of synaptic depression following persistent activation seem to be absent from in vitro recordings, and these could influence the obtained uEPSP. In figure 3C, it is suggested by intracellular recordings in L4 that the thalamus' efficacy decreases if it fires repeatedly. This coherently explains why the lack of spontaneous activity in vitro contributes to larger EPSPs. The ingenious presentation of recordings also allows us to see a difference between anesthetized and sedated conditions. While the latter has substantial spontaneous rates — 5.4 Hz —, the former condition has an average of 1 second ISI. These values are in the order of those presented in figure 3C, and are consistent with the observation that " aPSPs of TC–barrel neuron connections are smaller during sedation than during anesthesia ". However, an ISI of 1 second seems to be sufficient to fully recover from synaptic depression, as the values in 3C seemingly converge to an upper bound. It is no wonder, then, that the strongest synapses in the anesthetized condition were also in the order of 4 mV, although their average is 1.94 mV. The reduced driving force in vivo can likely account for this disparity. The values of aPSPs presented above were obtained using dual recordings in the alive brain of rodents, either sedated or anesthetized. Extracellular recordings were made on the VPM nucleus, in barreloids. The low resolution of these recordings is sufficient, given that only (easily observable) action potentials have an effect on their efferents. These are also difficult areas to access using patch pipettes. The membrane potential was simultaneously recorded inside cortical neurons, mostly within layer 4 of somatotopically aligned barrels, to explore this " strong-synapse model. " While barrages of thalamic and cortical postsynaptic potentials continuously generate large enough V m fluctuations to obscure uEPSPs of single TC–L4 synapses, the researchers computed spike-triggered averages of cortical V m during periodic stimulation of VPM, and corrected for stimulus-induced correlations by subtracting the shift-predictor. This yielded the aPSP that a single thalamic AP evokes in the cortical cell, despite all the excitatory and inhibitory inputs it is a target of. The researchers were also keen in reducing the noise in the cortical neuron by modulating the amount of thalamic neurons firing in synchrony, through the choice of a slow oscillatory movement for the whisker deflections.