The structural approach to joint inversion, entailing common boundaries or gradients, offers a flexible way to invert diverse types of surface-based and/or crosshole geophysical data. The cross-gradients function has been introduced as a...
moreThe structural approach to joint inversion, entailing common boundaries or gradients, offers a flexible way to invert diverse types of surface-based and/or crosshole geophysical data. The cross-gradients function has been introduced as a means to construct models in which spatial changes in two models are parallel or anti-parallel. Inversion methods that use such structural constraints also provide estimates of non-linear and non-unique field-scale relationships between model parameters. Here, we invert jointly crosshole radar and seismic traveltimes for structurally similar models using an iterative non-linear traveltime tomography algorithm. Application of the inversion scheme to synthetic data demonstrates that it better resolves lithological boundaries than the individual inversions. Tests of the scheme on observed radar and seismic data acquired within a shallow aquifer illustrate that the resultant models have improved correlations with flowmeter data than with models based on individual inversions. The highest correlation with the flowmeter data is obtained when the joint inversion is combined with a stochastic regularization operator, where the vertical integral scale is estimated from the flowmeter data. Point-spread functions shows that the most significant resolution improvements of the joint inversion is in the horizontal direction. To determine petrophysical properties, state variables, and structural boundaries, it may be necessary to combine information provided by models obtained from different geophysical data (e.g., . Interpretation of several individually inverted data sets can be illuminating, but the results are usually affected by the resolution limitations of each model. For consistent interpretations of multiple geophysical models, it would be advantageous to have inversion tools that have similar formulations of the inverse problem regardless of the type of geophysical data being inverted. This would allow models to be coupled, as long as the data have comparable spatial support. By joint inversion, we refer to coupled models that are obtained by simultaneously minimizing a misfit function that includes the data misfit of each data type. Joint inversion can improve the resolution of each geophysical model and provide models that are consistent with each other and therefore easier to interpret (e.g., ). is not yet a standard tool in geophysical applications, mainly because robust and well-established petrophysical models that can be used to couple the models are usually only available for certain geophysical parameters, such as compressional and shear wave slownesses . Furthermore, petrophysical models often apply only in restricted geological settings (e.g., . In addition, the parameters of petrophysical models can seldom be adequately constrained by individual field data sets, such that fairly strong assumptions are required to couple models based on their petrophysical properties. To avoid introducing questionable petrophysical models, joint inversion methods have been developed for layered (1D) structures that are expected to have coincident layer boundaries and constant properties within each layer (e.g., Monteiro Santos et al., 2006). A