Key research themes
1. How does Adorno conceptualize the dialectical relationship between art and philosophy in aesthetic experience?
This theme explores Adorno's central thesis in Aesthetic Theory that art and philosophy are mutually constitutive, especially in modernity. The research elucidates why aesthetic experience requires philosophical reflection and conversely, why philosophy requires engagement with art. The focus lies on the critical and dialectical functions of art and philosophy to reveal truth-content embedded in historical and social realities, notably through the acknowledgment of non-identity and material particularity. This relationship matters because it frames modern aesthetic experience as a site of social critique and a mode of historical consciousness that counters ideological reification.
2. How can Adorno’s critical theory extend to the social function and aesthetic evaluation of modern music and technoculture?
This theme investigates Adorno’s critique of popular and modern music forms regarding their social function, aesthetic structure, and ideological effects under late capitalism. It contrasts Adorno’s skeptical analyses with more sympathetic contemporary accounts, particularly in electronic and techno music. The inquiry centers on how musical technique, temporal structure, and experiential modes either perpetuate alienation or enable new subjectivities. This theme matters because it situates Adorno’s critical aesthetics within contemporary cultural practices, revealing tensions between culture industry logics and emancipatory potential in sonic art.
3. How does Adorno’s negative dialectics inform understanding of radical negativity, mourning, and modern aesthetic representation?
This research theme focuses on Adorno’s philosophical method of negative dialectics, particularly its application to concepts of radical negativity beyond the subject, as well as psychological and aesthetic processes such as mourning and non-identity. The work reveals how negativity is conceptualized not as a simple negation but as a productive tension that resists totalizing closure, thereby preserving the non-identical and enabling critical consciousness. This theme highlights the methodological import of Adorno’s aesthetics for understanding the limits of representation, the persistence of suffering, and the enigmatic character of aesthetic and psychic negation.