Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Diphthongization in Three Regional Varieties of Swedish

2019

Abstract

This study investigates diphthongization in three Swedish varieties that the literature has regarded as different: Lund, Linköping and Stockholm. In all three varieties, the high vowels /iː/, /yː/, /ʉː/ and /uː/ turn out to only marginally glide, if at all, and /eː/ exhibits clear diphthongization of a centralizing nature. For /oː/, a similar centralization is found in Stockholm, but none is found in Linköping, and the reverse is found in Lund. /ɛː/, /øː/ and /ɑː/ do not diphthongize, but /ɛː/ and /øː/ are realized strikingly low in all three varieties, suggesting an alternative transcription as /æː/ and /œː/. An additional finding is that geminate consonants are hardly longer than singleton consonants, so that the fundamental Swedish binary distinction between VCː and VːC syllable types nowadays has to rely on differences in vowel duration, vowel quality, and diphthongization. Diphthongization may thus be an instrument in the maintenance of auditory contrast.

References (20)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Bartlett, M.S. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proc. Royal Soc. A 160 (901), 268.
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. 2014. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package, version 1.1-19.
  4. Björsten, S., Engstrand, O. 1999. Swedish 'damped' /i/ and /y/: experimental and typological observations. Proc. 14 th ICPhS San Francisco.
  5. Bleckert, L. 1987. Centralsvensk diftongering som satsfonetisk problem. Stockholm: Graphic Systems AB.
  6. Boersma, P., Weenink, D. 1992-2018. Praat, a program for doing phonetics by computer. praat.org.
  7. Bruce, G. 1970. Diphthongization in the Malmö dialect. Working Papers 3, Phonetics Laboratory, University of Lund, 1-19.
  8. Bruce, G. 2010. Vår fonetiska geografi. Om Svenskans accenter, melodi och uttal. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  9. Eklund, I., Traunmüller, H. 1997. Comparative study of male and female whispered and phonated versions of the long vowels of Swedish. Phonetica 54, 1-21.
  10. Elert, C. 1966. Allmän och svensk fonetik. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  11. Engstrand, O. 1999. Swedish. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the usage of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Ericsson, T. 1914. Grundlinjer till undersökningen av Södermanlands folkmål. Stockholm.
  13. Gjerdman, O. 1918. Studier över de sörmländska stadsmålens kvalitativa ljudlära. Uppsala.
  14. Kotsinas, U. 2004. Ungdomsspråk. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.
  15. Kuronen, M. 2000. Vokaluttalets akustik i sverigesvenska, finlandsvenska och finska. University of Jyväskylä.
  16. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B. 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13), 1-26.
  17. R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R-project.org.
  18. Riad, T. 2013. The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Schaeffler, F. 2005. Phonological quantity in Swedish varieties: a data-driven categorisation. Proceedings FONETIK 2005. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
  20. Upmark, G. 1869. Upplysningar om folkspråket i Södertorn. Stockholm.