Algorithmic Complexity and Entanglement of Quantum States
2005, Physical Review Letters
https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.95.200503Abstract
We define the algorithmic complexity of a quantum state relative to a given precision parameter, and give upper bounds for various examples of states. We also establish a connection between the entanglement of a quantum state and its algorithmic complexity.
References (26)
- R. J. Solomonoff, Information and Control 7, 1 (1964).
- A. N. Kolmogorov, Probl. Inf. Transmission 1, 1 (1965).
- G. J. Chaitin, Information, Randomness & Incomplete- ness (World Scientific, 1987).
- C. H. Bennett, Internal J. Theoret. Phys. 21, 905 (1982).
- W. H. Zurek, Nature 341, 119 (1989).
- R. Schack and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992).
- C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. E 47 (1993).
- J. Eisert and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001).
- A. Berthiaume et al., J. Compute. System Sci. 63 (2001).
- P. Vitanyi, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 2464 (2001).
- P. Gács, J. Phys. A 34, 6859 (2001).
- N. Bohr, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958).
- T. Yamakami, arXiv: quant-ph/0412172 (2003).
- Adopting this scenario we arrive to a notion of complexity similar to that introduced in [9].
- This approach is close to Bohr's viewpoint that the quan- tum state is essentially an expression of an experimental scenario [12].
- C. H. Bennett, How to Define Complexity in Physics and Why (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City California, 1990), pp. 137-148.
- Here and in the following we use the signs (≃, ) when the relationships are expressed up to the leading order.
- J. J. Vartiainen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 177902 (2004).
- A. Y. Kitaev, Russ. Math. Surv. 52, 1191 (1997).
- This, in fact, would again require to describe arbitrary unitary transformations.
- Even though almost all states are complex, it is impossi- ble to prove that any given state is. This derives from the fact that the statement:"The complexity of the classical string ω is greater than N " is unprovable [22].
- G. J. Chaitin, Randomness and Mathematical Proof, Sci- entific American 232 (5) (1975).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
- C. E. Mora and H. J. Briegel, arXiv: quant-ph/0412172.
- By W and GHZ states we intend N /qubit entangled states of the form, respectively, (|0...01 + |0...10 + ... + |1...00 )/ √ N and (|00...0 + |11...1 )/ √
- This procedure succeeds with exponentially low proba- bility, but this is not relevant from our point of view: we are in fact interested in the description of the procedure, not in the time or resources needed to apply it.