Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Cooperative manipulation between humans and teleoperated agents

2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings.

Abstract

Robonaut is a humanoid robot designed by the Robotic Systems Technology Branch at NASA's Johnson Space Center in a collaborative effort with DARPA. This paper describes the implementation of haptic feedback into Robonaut. We conducted a cooperative manipulation task, inserting a flexible beam into an instrumented receptacle. This task was performed while both a human at the worksite and the teleoperated robot grasped the flexible beam simultaneously. Peak forces in the receptacle were consistently lower when the human operator was provided with kinesthetic force feedback in addition to other modalities of feedback such as gestures and voice commands. These findings are encouraging as the Dexterous Robotics Lab continues to implement force feedback into its teleoperator hardware architecture.

References (16)

  1. References
  2. Ambrose, R.O., H. Aldridge, R.S. Askew, R.R. Burridge, W. Bluethmann, M. Diftler, C. Lovchik, D. Magruder, and F. Rehnmark, (2000) "Robonaut: NASA's space humanoid," Humanoid Robotics, Vol. 15(4), pp. 57-62.
  3. Hill, J.W. (1979) "Study of modeling and evaluation of remote manipulation tasks with force feedback," NASA- CR-158721, SRI International Corp. for JPL.
  4. Draper, J., J. Herndon, and W. Moore (1987) "The implications of force reflection for teleoperation in space," Oak Ridge National Laboratory paper presented at Goddard Conference on Space Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.
  5. Hannaford, B., L. Wood, D.A. McAffee, and H. Zak (1991) "Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 21(3), pp. 620-633.
  6. Kim, W.S. (1991) "A new scheme of force reflecting control," NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Fifth Annual Workshop of Space Operations Applications and Research (SOAR 91), Vol. 1, pp. 254-261.
  7. Massimino, M. and T. Sheridan (1992) "Sensory substitution of force feedback for the human-machine interface in space teleoperation," 43rd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, World Space Congress, IAF/iAA-92-0246.
  8. Williams, L., R. Loftin, H. Aldridge, E. Leiss, and W. Bluethmann (2002) "Kinesthetic and visual force display for telerobotics," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2 , pp. 1249-1254.
  9. Millman, P.A. (1995) "Effects of non-uniform environment damping on haptic perception and performance of aimed movements," Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC Vol. 57-2, pp. 703-711.
  10. Dennerlein, J.T. (2000) "Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steering-targeting tasks," Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI), pp. 423-429.
  11. Wall, S.A., and W.S. Harwin (2000) "Quantification of the effects of haptic feedback during a motor skills task in a simulated environment," Proceedings of the 2nd Phantom Users Research Symposium, Zurich, Switzerland.
  12. Williams, L. (2001) "Bisensory Force Feedback in Telerobotics," Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, TX.
  13. Rochlis, J.L. (2002) "Human Factors and Telerobotics: Tools and Approaches for Designing Remote Robotics Workstation Displays," Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  14. Ferrell, W.R. (1965) "Remote manipulation with transmission delay," IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-6(1).
  15. Richard, P. and Ph. Coiffet (1999) "Dexterous haptic interaction in virtual environments: Human performance evaluations," Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction, pp. 315-320.
  16. O'Malley, M. and M. Goldfarb (2002) "The implications of surface stiffness for size identification and perceived surface hardness in haptic interfaces," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1255-1260.